Interesting suggestion: Strict liability for murder of children.
His point: We have strict liability for rape of children, but not murder of children.
He suggests that no intent should need to be proven for murder of children; just prove that the act occurred.
Thoughts?
I suppose you would at least have to prove that the act wasn't an accident like a car crash. In the Lindsey Clancy case, we know she murdered her children, and yet we had a hung jury as to her mental state. Do we allow "innocent by reason of insanity" in statutory rape cases? I did 30 seconds of research, and it seems that there is some disagreement among the states.
This message has been edited 2 time(s).
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.