Mar-a-lago warrant has no legal basis per 2 Constitutional lawyers-their explanation

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Upvote this post.

0

Downvote this post.

Mar-a-lago warrant has no legal basis per 2 Constitutional lawyers-their explanation

Author: BaronVonZemo (60103 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 1:12 pm on Aug 24, 2022

View All

(no message)

Link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-trump-warrant-had-no-legal-basis-mar-a-lago-affidavit-presidential-records-act-archivist-custody-classified-fbi-garland-11661170684

Replies to: "Mar-a-lago warrant has no legal basis per 2 Constitutional lawyers-their explanation"

Mar-a-lago warrant has no legal basis per 2 Constitutional lawyers-their explanation [NT] [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 1:12pm 8/24/22 (25) [View All]
- Wait someone on here said it would not take a Constitutional Lawyer to figure this stuff out. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 9:58pm 8/24/22
  - To be specific, JH, in that other thread, I noted that two 'Constitutional Lawyers' suggested that - TyroneIrish - 1:30am 8/25/22
    - The PRA Code is more like guidelines, the rest is silent. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 2:19am 8/25/22
      - Am I wrong in assuming that NARA takes ownership as soon as - TyroneIrish - 11:45am 8/25/22
        Yes assume but I'll raise you briefs filed and arguments made during hearings by opposing litigants - JarHead4ND - 7:32pm 8/25/22
  - That was Tyrone. He's an effing wingnut. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 10:11pm 8/24/22
- Wouldn't it make sense for Trump to join media's motion to unseal the affidavit? - conorlarkin - 1:25pm 8/24/22
  - To your question- the DOJ gets to redact in whatever manner they choose.Such a release could hurt DT [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 1:34pm 8/24/22
    - The DOJ has pledged to redact everything that won't be leaked to the NYT or WaPo [NT] - Iggle - 2:10pm 8/24/22
  - If you cannot access the WSJ,at least read my response to Chris below. From legal standing viewpoint - BaronVonZemo - 1:29pm 8/24/22
    - Whether DOJ chooses to file an indictment is a different question than the lawfulness of the SW. - conorlarkin - 1:39pm 8/24/22
      - Given Garland is the most political position in the entire DOJ, I would expect him to be involved [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 3:17pm 8/24/22
- Must....defend.....leader.... [NT] - Chris94 - 1:20pm 8/24/22
  - Are you talking about Baron or the WSJ? I remember you telling me "I report, you decide". Isn't [LINK] - TampaIrish - 1:55pm 8/24/22
    - Hunter swiped his muffuletta out of the faculty fridge again. Chris is just hangry. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 2:58pm 8/24/22
  - PS -one of us is also defending unprecedented behavior by DOJ where questions haven't been answered - BaronVonZemo - 1:31pm 8/24/22
  - I thought it interesting. It still matter to me if he had unacceptable documents. But still, it - BaronVonZemo - 1:25pm 8/24/22
    - He...must...defend...Biden.... [NT] - NedoftheHill - 2:14pm 8/24/22
      - I criticized Biden in the thread below this one. I'm happy to do it when I disagree. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:00pm 8/24/22
        Oh...so if we criticize Trump once, we aren't in the cult? Important to know. - NedoftheHill - 4:25pm 8/24/22
        Nor me. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 6:39pm 8/24/22
        Oh, you both are cult members indeed. Baron being an Imperial Wizard - jimbasil - 3:42am 8/25/22
        
        Neither of you have JimB's promise to exclude you from the cult. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 10:06pm 8/24/22
        He just weighed in, lol. I get to be a wizard. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 9:13am 8/25/22
        “Imperial” wizard. Just make sure you take your hood off - jimbasil - 10:33am 8/25/22