So Garland didn't issue this memo?

Stark Raving Dad 5192 posts Joined: Aug 19, 2020

Posted 11:37 pm on Sep 5, 2022

And it didn't come out amid allegations that the guy who ran interference for Hunter "resigned". And after a dozen or so agents turned whistleblowers? Your contention is this did not happen? That's an interesting take. Even with the most sympathetic reading of the article. I'm not sure I agree with your conclusion.

"It’s always a wonder how you all are experts in everything." jimbasil 6/26/2022

Replies 24

So Garland didn't issue this memo? Stark Raving Dad 11:37pm · 9/5/22
- Your post says Garland is threatening whistleblowers. If the jimbasil 11:44pm · 9/5/22
  - I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school. Stark Raving Dad 11:46pm · 9/5/22
    - Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same. jimbasil 12:00am · 9/6/22
      - "We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney..." Who would that be Jim? Are you the oracle of the JarHead4ND 1:43am · 9/6/22
        
        This is classic Silent J. He’s uniting people with his truth. Spent the day yesterday arguing Link TampaIrish 7:59am · 9/6/22
        
        I wasn't really sure who he was referring to in that post. Stark Raving Dad 10:14am · 9/6/22
      - "Possible" espionage charge correct? That was the language used? Stark Raving Dad 12:03am · 9/6/22
        
        He’s being investigated for a crime under the espionage act. jimbasil 12:08am · 9/6/22
        
        Looks like it would be 18 USC Ch 37 section 794 or 798. Stark Raving Dad 12:19am · 9/6/22

View Full Conversation