I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school.

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school.

Author: Stark Raving Dad (5192 Posts - Joined: Aug 19, 2020)

Posted at 11:46 pm on Sep 5, 2022

View All

The DOJ looks like keystone cops and Merrick is trying to put the horses back in the barn.

"It’s always a wonder how you all are experts in everything." jimbasil 6/26/2022

Replies to: "I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school."

Merrick Garland subtly threatening whistleblowers? [LINK] - Stark Raving Dad - 9:26pm 9/5/22 (24) [View All]
- . [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:36pm 9/5/22
- I don’t see how anyone could conclude that from what is quoted - jimbasil - 11:13pm 9/5/22
  - Check out this excerpt from Baron's FOX link... - TyroneIrish - 11:39pm 9/5/22
    - You disagree? The DOJ has not come under criticism? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:01am 9/6/22
    - It’s exhausting trying to buffet the trumpians here. - jimbasil - 11:51pm 9/5/22
      - The law is a funny thing. You think you have something dead to rights. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:54pm 9/5/22
        No, you’re inventing a fact from a direct quote. If you have another quote - jimbasil - 12:03am 9/6/22
        Are you gonna start with that crap again? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:06am 9/6/22
        Did he threaten whistleblowers? No, he did not. - jimbasil - 12:10am 9/6/22
        Again the timing leads one to infer that it was indeed intentionally. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:26am 9/6/22
    - Stick to the subject. I think Ive heard that recently. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:49pm 9/5/22
  - So Garland didn't issue this memo? - Stark Raving Dad - 11:37pm 9/5/22
    - Your post says Garland is threatening whistleblowers. If the - jimbasil - 11:44pm 9/5/22
      - I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:46pm 9/5/22
        Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same. - jimbasil - 12:00am 9/6/22
        "We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney..." Who would that be Jim? Are you the oracle of the - JarHead4ND - 1:43am 9/6/22
        This is classic Silent J. He’s uniting people with his truth. Spent the day yesterday arguing [LINK] - TampaIrish - 7:59am 9/6/22
        I wasn't really sure who he was referring to in that post. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14am 9/6/22
        
        "Possible" espionage charge correct? That was the language used? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:03am 9/6/22
        He’s being investigated for a crime under the espionage act. - jimbasil - 12:08am 9/6/22
        Looks like it would be 18 USC Ch 37 section 794 or 798. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:19am 9/6/22
- Odd that he warns agents against talking to congress, but not the media (7 yrs of leaks) [IMAGE] - BaronVonZemo - 9:58pm 9/5/22
  - Well, he got caught with his pants down when agents started to fess up about Hunter. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14pm 9/5/22
    - So true. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 10:21pm 9/5/22

Consent Management