Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same.

Author: jimbasil (52631 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 12:00 am on Sep 6, 2022
View All

We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney therefore his alternate facts are correct, another inventing facts about DJT that are not true, another calling out the media for hating DJT as the reason for calling him a thief, others trying to blame law enforcement for doing their job and on and on when the simple facts are - he’s being investigated for espionage because he stole hundreds of documents from the government and refused to return them, a concession to return them instead of arrest no other American or POTUS would receive for that theft.

You people will go to all lengths to argue an untenable crime and you keep arguing. Unbelievable.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk

Replies to: "Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same."

  • Merrick Garland subtly threatening whistleblowers? [LINK] - Stark Raving Dad - 9:26pm 9/5/22 (24) [View All]
    • . [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:36pm 9/5/22
    • I don’t see how anyone could conclude that from what is quoted - jimbasil - 11:13pm 9/5/22
      • Check out this excerpt from Baron's FOX link... - TyroneIrish - 11:39pm 9/5/22
        • You disagree? The DOJ has not come under criticism? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:01am 9/6/22
        • It’s exhausting trying to buffet the trumpians here. - jimbasil - 11:51pm 9/5/22
          • The law is a funny thing. You think you have something dead to rights. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:54pm 9/5/22
            • No, you’re inventing a fact from a direct quote. If you have another quote - jimbasil - 12:03am 9/6/22
              • Are you gonna start with that crap again? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:06am 9/6/22
                • Did he threaten whistleblowers? No, he did not. - jimbasil - 12:10am 9/6/22
                  • Again the timing leads one to infer that it was indeed intentionally. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:26am 9/6/22
        • Stick to the subject. I think Ive heard that recently. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:49pm 9/5/22
      • So Garland didn't issue this memo? - Stark Raving Dad - 11:37pm 9/5/22
        • Your post says Garland is threatening whistleblowers. If the - jimbasil - 11:44pm 9/5/22
          • I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:46pm 9/5/22
            • Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same. - jimbasil - 12:00am 9/6/22
              • "We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney..." Who would that be Jim? Are you the oracle of the - JarHead4ND - 1:43am 9/6/22
                • This is classic Silent J. He’s uniting people with his truth. Spent the day yesterday arguing [LINK] - TampaIrish - 7:59am 9/6/22
                  • I wasn't really sure who he was referring to in that post. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14am 9/6/22
              • "Possible" espionage charge correct? That was the language used? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:03am 9/6/22
                • He’s being investigated for a crime under the espionage act. - jimbasil - 12:08am 9/6/22
                  • Looks like it would be 18 USC Ch 37 section 794 or 798. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:19am 9/6/22
    • Odd that he warns agents against talking to congress, but not the media (7 yrs of leaks) [IMAGE] - BaronVonZemo - 9:58pm 9/5/22
      • Well, he got caught with his pants down when agents started to fess up about Hunter. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14pm 9/5/22
        • So true. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 10:21pm 9/5/22
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS