which backs up your claim, then post it. Otherwise, you’re just raging about nothing.
ADVERTISEMENT
Replies to: "No, you’re inventing a fact from a direct quote. If you have another quote"
- Merrick Garland subtly threatening whistleblowers? [LINK]
- Stark Raving Dad - 9:26pm 9/5/22
(24) [View All]
- . [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:36pm 9/5/22
- I don’t see how anyone could conclude that from what is quoted - jimbasil - 11:13pm 9/5/22
- Check out this excerpt from Baron's FOX link... - TyroneIrish - 11:39pm 9/5/22
- You disagree? The DOJ has not come under criticism? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:01am 9/6/22
- It’s exhausting trying to buffet the trumpians here. - jimbasil - 11:51pm 9/5/22
- The law is a funny thing. You think you have something dead to rights. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:54pm 9/5/22
- No, you’re inventing a fact from a direct quote. If you have another quote - jimbasil - 12:03am 9/6/22
- Are you gonna start with that crap again? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:06am 9/6/22
- Did he threaten whistleblowers? No, he did not. - jimbasil - 12:10am 9/6/22
- Again the timing leads one to infer that it was indeed intentionally. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:26am 9/6/22
- Did he threaten whistleblowers? No, he did not. - jimbasil - 12:10am 9/6/22
- Are you gonna start with that crap again? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:06am 9/6/22
- No, you’re inventing a fact from a direct quote. If you have another quote - jimbasil - 12:03am 9/6/22
- The law is a funny thing. You think you have something dead to rights. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:54pm 9/5/22
- Stick to the subject. I think Ive heard that recently. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 11:49pm 9/5/22
- So Garland didn't issue this memo? - Stark Raving Dad - 11:37pm 9/5/22
- Your post says Garland is threatening whistleblowers. If the - jimbasil - 11:44pm 9/5/22
- I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:46pm 9/5/22
- Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same. - jimbasil - 12:00am 9/6/22
- "We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney..." Who would that be Jim? Are you the oracle of the - JarHead4ND - 1:43am 9/6/22
- This is classic Silent J. He’s uniting people with his truth. Spent the day yesterday arguing [LINK]
- TampaIrish - 7:59am 9/6/22
- I wasn't really sure who he was referring to in that post. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14am 9/6/22
- This is classic Silent J. He’s uniting people with his truth. Spent the day yesterday arguing [LINK]
- TampaIrish - 7:59am 9/6/22
- "Possible" espionage charge correct? That was the language used? - Stark Raving Dad - 12:03am 9/6/22
- He’s being investigated for a crime under the espionage act. - jimbasil - 12:08am 9/6/22
- Looks like it would be 18 USC Ch 37 section 794 or 798. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:19am 9/6/22
- He’s being investigated for a crime under the espionage act. - jimbasil - 12:08am 9/6/22
- "We’ve got one poster claiming he’s an attorney..." Who would that be Jim? Are you the oracle of the - JarHead4ND - 1:43am 9/6/22
- Um, no they don’t - your deflection from facts is more of the same. - jimbasil - 12:00am 9/6/22
- I think the implication is clear. No more speaking out of school. - Stark Raving Dad - 11:46pm 9/5/22
- Your post says Garland is threatening whistleblowers. If the - jimbasil - 11:44pm 9/5/22
- Check out this excerpt from Baron's FOX link... - TyroneIrish - 11:39pm 9/5/22
- Odd that he warns agents against talking to congress, but not the media (7 yrs of leaks) [IMAGE]
- BaronVonZemo - 9:58pm 9/5/22
- Well, he got caught with his pants down when agents started to fess up about Hunter. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14pm 9/5/22
- So true. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 10:21pm 9/5/22
- Well, he got caught with his pants down when agents started to fess up about Hunter. - Stark Raving Dad - 10:14pm 9/5/22
Consent Management