Is this modern philosophy of, "If something (or someone) isn't 100% perfect then we have to worry and obsess that it (he) will turn out to be total crap."
I thought Golson played great on Saturday. Remember, he hasn't played one down of college football. And Hendrix, he's barely played. I don't understand this obsession we have of making snap judgments on every player based on extremely small samples. Several posters here made the "astute" observation, based on one half of football at Stanford, that Hendrix had certain deficiencies in his game that were permanent problems.
Let's get real. Until a new QB has at least a couple of games under his belt, it's hard to make certain definitive statements about him.