That's the question. That's where we want to be. Very tough thing to do...and very few programs are capable of doing it even when operating at maximum efficiency. We are one of them. There are good signs over the last 2 years but time will tell.
Replies to: "You are right, we weren't far off. But that was last year. Bama and Clemson can maintain. Can we?"
- Re-watched Clemson game - murph92675 - 3:58pm 1/8/19
(18) [View All]
- Well..maybe I'm not saying this right..cause - I get grief for this kind of talk but..you're right. - Karamello - 8:36pm 1/11/19
- Re-watched Clemson game - bwnotredame06 - 1:05pm 1/11/19
- DVR'd it - but YouTube should have it [NT] - murph92675 - 2:00pm 1/12/19
- You are right, we weren't far off. But that was last year. Bama and Clemson can maintain. Can we? - tky21 - 10:29pm 1/10/19
- You're a total lunatic and I agree with you 100%. Well done. [NT] - Jerseymick - 10:57am 1/10/19
- Agree - croaker - 8:04pm 1/9/19
- Big Play Problem - Dinglewood - 5:43pm 1/9/19
- I agree. And momentum is everything. I believe if the fumble isn't over ruled and we punch one in - IrishBarry - 8:13am 1/9/19
- Nice post. [NT] - faircatchcorby - 1:39am 1/9/19
- Again with aunts having balls and being uncles-doesn't transgender stuff belong on Open Forum. [NT] - Rooster - 11:35pm 1/8/19
- "but to say they are not in the same league as Clemson is not quite true also." - Hank the Tank - 8:16pm 1/8/19
- ND lost 44 - 3? I thought it was 30 - 3 [NT]
- murph92675 - 8:22pm 1/8/19
- He must be an AP voter. [NT] - Napoleon - 10:34pm 1/8/19
- ND lost 44 - 3? I thought it was 30 - 3 [NT]
- murph92675 - 8:22pm 1/8/19
- We scored 3 points [NT]
- holybull101 - 8:11pm 1/8/19
- I agree - ND would not have won. With a few breaks - it would have been competitive - murph92675 - 8:21pm 1/8/19
- Re: Re-watched Clemson game - Frankx - 6:27pm 1/8/19
- Agree. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 6:09pm 1/8/19
- Well done. [NT] - hipND - 5:58pm 1/8/19
