right with them.
Alabama's wide receivers are definitely a cut above, but other than that I think we are
Replies to: "Alabama's wide receivers are definitely a cut above, but other than that I think we are"
- I see Bama at 1 lvl above ND, Clemson at a 1/2 level above when fully healthy, & OSU 1/2 lvl below - BaronVonZemo - 8:28pm 11/28/20
(10) [View All]
- ND OL v Bama DL will determine our ability to compete. Clemson is even. [NT] - ND521 - 1:20pm 11/29/20
- Clemson throttled Pitt with ease yesterday. [NT]
- whatsamataU - 8:41am 11/29/20
- ND “throttled” Pitt too. [NT] - Napoleon - 9:06am 11/29/20
- Agreed - Bama is semi pro everywhere, tough to overcome that [NT]
- Law_Dogg - 12:35am 11/29/20
- Nope. Pure pro, including game day wages. [NT] - faircatchcorby - 12:34pm 11/29/20
- Alabama's wide receivers are definitely a cut above, but other than that I think we are - THEISMANCARR - 9:39pm 11/28/20
- This^^^^^ [NT] - ColeyO - 11:16pm 11/28/20
- Re: I see Bama at 1 lvl above ND, Clemson at a 1/2 level above when fully healthy, & OSU 1/2 lvl below - primo - 9:22pm 11/28/20
- I'm talking about the teams as a whole. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 12:00am 11/29/20
- While I tend to agree with that, I'm not quite sold on Bama's defense. - NDavenue - 8:44pm 11/28/20
