Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2020 Football Schedule
2020 Football Coaching Staff
2020 Notre Dame Football Roster
2020 Football Scholarship Chart
Notre Dame Football Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Highlights
NFL Fighting Irish
Past Seasons & Results
Game Archive
Player Archive
Recruiting
Class of 2021 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2018 Commit List
Notre Dame Recruiting Film Evaluations
Visits News
Archives
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Latest News
History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Rivalries
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame Traditions
Notre Dame National Championships
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Touchdown Jesus
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Stadium
Past Results
Videos
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
Football Message Board
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Sure, they could have. You don't think Bama was defending that?
Author:
Irish_Demon
(1935 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 5:48 pm on Jan 1, 2021
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "Sure, they could have. You don't think Bama was defending that?"
With 9 seconds, they could have taken a shot at the end zone.
[NT]
-
jray
- 5:45pm 1/1/21
(5)
[View All]
A jump ball to McKinley or Skow had better chance than a FG try by our head case kicker.
[NT]
-
ND521
- 5:51pm 1/1/21
Sure, they could have. You don't think Bama was defending that?
[NT]
-
Irish_Demon
- 5:48pm 1/1/21
That made no sense not taking one shot in the end zone before the FG attempt
[NT]
-
crowlaw
- 5:47pm 1/1/21
That I agree with, but not with the 4th down play
[NT]
-
Irish_Demon
- 5:48pm 1/1/21
Whoops, that would be why. Was watching the 22 man camera last drive and didn't notice it was 4th d
[NT]
-
crowlaw
- 6:08pm 1/1/21