Huh? Smith and Waddle are gone. Metchie was ranked #275 by Scout (way outside Top 100).

| Register

Huh? Smith and Waddle are gone. Metchie was ranked #275 by Scout (way outside Top 100).

Author: NDavenue (7489 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:32 pm on Jan 19, 2021

View All

The post was about recruiting highly ranked WRs. The fact is that we had comparable, if not better WR recruiting than they did for 3 straight years. So, the depth chart and whether or not they need to play 19/20 WRs is not relevant. But like I said, Waddle and Smith are both gone. So, yes they need to play the 19/20 guys.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

I don't believe illusions because too much is for real.

Replies to: "Huh? Smith and Waddle are gone. Metchie was ranked #275 by Scout (way outside Top 100)."

In 2018, 19, 20 Alabama recruited a total of 1 WR in the Top 100. - NDavenue - 3:13pm 1/19/21 (10) [View All]
- They need to be able to play for that to happen - ndunabomber - 9:37am 1/23/21
- You make a great point. Bad scheme and bad position coaching at ND for sure. - oldirish - 10:21pm 1/19/21
  - Hopefully Rees will improve. He had a decent first year. - NDavenue - 7:54am 1/20/21
    - But Rees doesn't coach WR's that was the point we don't have a good WR coach. [NT] - oldirish - 10:21pm 1/23/21
- Time for Rees to grow up quick - croaker - 8:20pm 1/19/21
  - Agree. [NT] - NDavenue - 7:54am 1/20/21
- Agree, we should have been more explosive this year. [NT] - DadUdaMan4 - 5:11pm 1/19/21
- Metchie,Smith& Waddle could STILL have eligibility next year. What would they use a '19,'20 wr for? - BaronVonZemo - 5:00pm 1/19/21
  - Huh? Smith and Waddle are gone. Metchie was ranked #275 by Scout (way outside Top 100). - NDavenue - 5:32pm 1/19/21
- Nice post. [NT] - Irish_Demon - 3:40pm 1/19/21