Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register

I can under the belief that if the O could consistently score 24-31. The D would not be gassed in

Author: oldirish (9339 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)
Posted at 9:57 am on Sep 12, 2022
View All

the 4th.

Yes, it is an assumption. A hypothesis. One I'd like to see proven or disproven. Let's assume, I'm wrong and you're right. Given we've now solved the O we can see what parts of the D are wrong. At that point, we'd have at least two units roughly pulling their weight. So the team would be in much better position. If that were the case we wouldn't be 0-3 in the Freeman era, because we have one side of the ball not pulling their weight at all period.

You can't win with one unit pulling it's weight.

Yes, the D isn't great but it's pulling its weight. I don't know when this article was written but it says (skimmed) the most common score is 55pts. 55/2 = 27.5

Our defense is only giving up 20 this year. or 72% of expected.

Our offense isn't even close averaging 15.5 or only 56% of expected. That's terrible. A major problem which likely leads to a D giving up more points for being gased.

No I do not think our D is great. I think our O is THE MAJOR problem that has to be fixed now and first.


Link: https://www.boydsbets.com/key-numbers-for-college-football-totals/

Replies to: "I can under the belief that if the O could consistently score 24-31. The D would not be gassed in"

  • PSA: 90+ yard drives are optically bad. They ARE NOT THE PROBLEM at ND. THE OFFENSE IS THE PROBLEM. [NT] - oldirish - 9:22am 9/12/22 (24) [View All]
    • Just stop, oldirirish. Giving up back breaking 4th quarter TDs is a problem, a very big problem. [NT] - FinnMcCool - 2:36pm 9/12/22
      • https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=6&msgid=495838 [NT] [LINK] - oldirish - 8:00pm 9/12/22
    • I agree, the defense is good enough to win all the games, the offense is not [NT] - holybull101 - 1:01pm 9/12/22
      • Glaringly obvious. D has some holes but what D doesn't in CFB now. [NT] - oldirish - 9:22pm 9/13/22
    • The offense is the problem, but giving up 2 95 yard drives in the 4th when the game is on the - Frank L - 9:58am 9/12/22
      • See below -> link [NT] [LINK] - oldirish - 9:59am 9/12/22
    • Luv ya old, but take off the blinders...we don't have ONE problem, we have many - Chrisb - 9:42am 9/12/22
      • btw. I do appreciate your logic / analysis too. [NT] - oldirish - 10:40am 9/12/22
      • No blinders. Strictly what would it take to be 2 and 0. We wouldn't have needed to score even 30. - oldirish - 9:44am 9/12/22
        • But you don't know that, our D has shown against 3 teams in a row (since Freeman took over) - Chrisb - 9:52am 9/12/22
          • Yes. it is A problem. Not THE problem. You create solutions for THE problem first. [NT] - oldirish - 9:58am 9/12/22
    • The offense is 80% of the problem - OklahomaIrishman - 9:39am 9/12/22
    • I agree the offense is the bigger problem. The defense is not good however. You described it as... - TakethetrainKnute - 9:29am 9/12/22
      • If you told me. Your offense only needs to score about 24pts to win. I'd say, that's phenominal. I - oldirish - 9:37am 9/12/22
        • And thanks for proving my point... - TakethetrainKnute - 10:26am 9/12/22
          • so mad you deleted your post below. Then reused my line on me. [NT] - oldirish - 10:44am 9/12/22
            • Mad? Post below was deleted because it was out of position and was re-posted below yours... [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 10:52am 9/12/22
              • You you decided to steal my response and use it on another thread +++ [LINK] - oldirish - 8:05pm 9/12/22
        • But you can't say that, because if the O scored 24 - Chrisb - 9:47am 9/12/22
          • I can under the belief that if the O could consistently score 24-31. The D would not be gassed in [LINK] - oldirish - 9:57am 9/12/22
            • D outperforming by 28% and O underperforming by 44% of expected total. [NT] - oldirish - 10:05am 9/12/22
            • I agree with this. [NT] - Frank L - 9:59am 9/12/22
              • Thanks. It's the glaring evidence that's being overlooked. [NT] - oldirish - 10:01am 9/12/22
      • He's not the sharpest tool in the shed by any means. [NT] - notredame678 - 9:37am 9/12/22
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS