UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

No, I said "There are literally ZERO SEC teams that have played 6-7 ranked teams". This statement is a fact.

When I/we say 11-1 ND we say "if" they do that, I/we think they'll be this..but we aren't saying they should be ranked right now in a certain spot as if they've already done that. Any projection or prediction I do of them right now is based on what has already happened...I still feel like MF will find a way to drop one more, so if I based on what I think the future is, they'd be 10-2 and out. But right now based on what has occurred I predict them to be in the 8-10 range in the first playoff ranking.

I only responded to your statement the way I did because you stated it as something that should be factored into how ND is ranked compared to them right now.

Can you please tell me how the bottom dwellers in the SEC who are not playoff contenders playing tough schedules (based on future info) relates to how ND should be rated compared to their contenders right now, who haven't played that many ranked teams. It's just like when you were putting Clemson above ND and I said they haven't beaten anyone. You based it on projected wins they would have, then they get spanked by Louisville.

I'm not telling you what you can/can't say, just be clear about it...there was no reason in the context you said that, for me to think you were talking about what the bottom dwellers with 5, 6, 7 losses would have played by the end of the season...you even mentioned 2 loss SEC teams as if it applied to them.