Register

According to the announcers MF had shown the play to Refs prior to the game

TyroneIrish 25794 posts Joined: Oct 8, 2020

Posted 7:39 am on Nov 17, 2024

and gotten approval…

Replies 24

According to the announcers MF had shown the play to Refs prior to the game TyroneIrish 7:39am · 11/17/24
- That’s what Freeman was mouthing.NT whatsamataU 9:42am · 11/17/24
- ND probably did not specify to the refs the number of players who would wear receiver numbers.NT SteveM 9:17am · 11/17/24
  - I had wondered about this detail. Perhaps small but very important ndphysics 5:12pm · 11/17/24
- The ACC is no friend to Notre Dame. AlbanyIRISH 7:50am · 11/17/24
  - It would appear that way…NT TyroneIrish 8:27am · 11/17/24
- Yes, but MF made no mention of it in his post game unless I missed it.NT ELP 7:49am · 11/17/24
  - “Cost/Benefit Ratio” for continuing the debate isn’t worth it…we won handily.NT TyroneIrish 8:30am · 11/17/24
    - Yep. Also besides pass interference so inconsistently called, I hate inadvertent face mask THEISMANCARR 11:14am · 11/17/24
      - Could not agree more… TyroneIrish 11:33am · 11/17/24
        
        The calls weren't "facemask" penalties. They were for illegal hands to the face McIrish 12:22pm · 11/17/24
        
        Yup, and the ones I saw looked like legit calls, especially the one on 78 bringing back Frank L 12:50pm · 11/17/24
        
        Didn't 78 basically extend his arms sideways and the defender ran into his hand? Even if it was THEISMANCARR 1:09am · 11/18/24

View Full Conversation