Back to threaded view Full conversation · 38 posts

So no R’s here are willing to challenge and condemn DJT’s desire to suspend the US Constitution

jimbasil 55023 posts Joined: Nov 15, 2007

Posted10:48 pm on Dec 5, 2022

that he may be able to regain the presidency?

You’ve had 3 days to do so.

I guess that’s the cowardice to be expected here.

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk

Level 1

I read his quote - not at all what he meant, just what MSM spun for the D's

BaronVonZemo 64184 posts 3:11 am on Dec 6, 2022

(no message)

View Single #109412
- Level 2
  
  You mean you're going to interpret for him because, why?
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:05 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  (no message)
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109419
  - Level 3
    
    You already interpreted his words. So did MSM. Please use his original words, not yours.
    
    Eli 9898 posts 4:26 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    (no message)
    
    View Single #109428
    - Level 4
      
      Hey numbskull - he wrote the post - it's pretty darn clear
      
      jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:37 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      "Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution, Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!
      Jack, he is a banker
      and Jane, she is a clerk
      
      View Single #109430
      - Level 5
        
        Braindead, so you agree 2020 election is a Massive Fraud. If you want to accept a part
        
        Eli 9898 posts 4:58 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        of his words you have to accept his whole words without breaking the term logic of original words.
        
        View Single #109438
        
        Level 6
        
        If I was in a cult and was as stupid as you, then I'd agree to that. But I'm not. Though
        
        jimbasil OP55023 posts 5:17 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        stick to it. You might find out in reality, you're just a dupe.
        Jack, he is a banker
        and Jane, she is a clerk
        
        View Single #109444
        
        Level 7
        
        Agree you were not stupid. You are stupid and always. No past tense about your stupidity.
        
        Eli 9898 posts 5:42 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        (no message)
        
        View Single #109451
Level 1

Interesting. Trump just condemned this view. Said he didn't mean that. Who would've thought?

NedoftheHill 47372 posts 2:16 am on Dec 6, 2022

Now Jim can never condemn setting aside the Constitution, now that Trump has done so.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

View Single #109405
- Level 2
  
  Not so interesting is, you R's here didn't condemn his tweet. And Trump didn't condemn his own tweet
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:17 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  - he said he didn't mean to he just meant he wanted to right the wrong done to him.
  
  But then, he did try to circumvent the constitution prior to 1/6 and on 1/6. So, what does his newest
  claim mean?
  
  That you didn't condemn or even challenge his tweet means, you accept the path of setting aside the
  constitution for your goals.
  
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109421
  - Level 3
    
    Obviously you have a reading ability deficiency. It must be difficult.
    
    NedoftheHill 47372 posts 4:56 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    (no message)
    Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
    
    View Single #109436
    - Level 4
      
      Trump didn't condemn anything - Unless you'd care to share the link.
      
      jimbasil OP55023 posts 5:18 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      (no message)
      Jack, he is a banker
      and Jane, she is a clerk
      
      View Single #109445
- Level 2
  
  Interesting no D's here willing to condemn D Party/Social media collusion to block 1rst Amend rights
  
  BaronVonZemo 64184 posts 3:46 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  They simply accuse Trump of that which they did to him now.
  
  View Single #109417
  - Level 3
    
    Yep. They want a living, breathing Constitution, that will do what they want. So, they accuse Trump.
    
    NedoftheHill 47372 posts 4:58 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    (no message)
    Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
    
    View Single #109437
    - Level 4
      
      Yeah, that makes zero sense.
      
      jimbasil OP55023 posts 5:18 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      (no message)
      Jack, he is a banker
      and Jane, she is a clerk
      
      View Single #109446
Level 1

Are you only asking Republicans? If so, I suppose you can disregard my answer.

NedoftheHill 47372 posts 1:34 am on Dec 6, 2022

Do you condemn all attempts to circumvent of the Constitution, including the first and second amendments? I do. I will condemn members of both parties who do that. Really interested to hear whether you do, too. Hoping we have some common ground.

The good news is, such efforts are only systemic on one party, the Democrats, who has Twitter, NYT, WP, the FBI, etc. acting like propaganda arms of the DNC. Join me in championing the Constitution, and condemning all attempts to circumvent it, whether done by Biden or Trump.

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

View Single #109398
- Level 2
  
  That's just a batshit crazy post by you.
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:38 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  (no message)
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109431
Level 1

We shouldn’t have to worry about Trump. Between January 6th and Mara Lago he’s

MuskyTommy 4231 posts 11:38 pm on Dec 5, 2022

going to be criminally charged. At least that’s what I’ve read on here before. Desantis it is.

View Single #109386
- Level 2
  
  That's just deflection - he held the office of the president, his words mean something. That's
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:22 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  why this nation needs to condemn his tweet. You included.
  
  But you won't because you're in the cult too.
  
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109425
Level 1

Misquoted and misinterpreted as usual but I am for DeSantis.

THEISMANCARR 18111 posts 11:21 pm on Dec 5, 2022

(no message)

View Single #109377
- Level 2
  
  Definitely not misquoted - you're wrong and you always are wrong. He clearly
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:19 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  states the rules and laws including the constitution should be set aside for him to regain the presidency.
  
  There is no mistake in the interpretation of his tweet.
  
  Just your moronic defense of it.
  
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109422
Level 1

No different than you Ds failing to condemn the silly or stupid stuff your side says/does

MarkHarman 7972 posts 11:20 pm on Dec 5, 2022

Seems like "the code" prohibits strong partisans from condemning one of their own, or praising the other side.

View Single #109376
- Level 2
  
  Oh please, save the bullshit!
  
  jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:19 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  (no message)
  Jack, he is a banker
  and Jane, she is a clerk
  
  View Single #109423
- Level 2
  
  Yeah that makes sense
  
  Chris94 39134 posts 1:35 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”
  
  Yeah, lots of Dems say stuff like that, I guess.
  
  The both-sides-do-it defense is the tool of the moron.
  
  View Single #109399
  - Level 3
    
    He meant that Dem cheating allows for bypassing the rules. You know this. Classic cheater deflection
    
    BaronVonZemo 64184 posts 3:14 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    (no message)
    
    View Single #109414
    - Level 4
      
      I know. I speak English. “bypassing the rules” = overthrowing the rule of law.
      
      Chris94 39134 posts 3:20 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      (no message)
      
      View Single #109415
      - Level 5
        
        He meant that D's bypassed the rule of law by using social media black outs. You're deflecting.
        
        BaronVonZemo 64184 posts 3:44 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        Why haven't you commented on the Musk revelation blockbuster? Because you don't care how they do it. The ends justify the means for you. Liberalism Rule #3. And this purposeful twisting of Trump's meaning allows you to even apply the pressure meant to be on Dems back onto Trump. Despicable.
        
        Of course, Trump has immediately denied the spin that he wants to end the Constitution, but your MSM doesn't report that either.
        
        View Single #109416
        
        Level 6
        
        You should rewrite all of his tweets. Oh wait, you always do. What's new?
        
        jimbasil OP55023 posts 4:20 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        (no message)
        Jack, he is a banker
        and Jane, she is a clerk
        
        View Single #109424
        
        Level 6
        
        I’m not deflecting anything. I’m quoting the former prez directly.
        
        Chris94 39134 posts 4:12 am on Dec 6, 2022
        
        And i don’t comment on the Twitter crap because I pay no attention to the Twitter crap. It’s the kind of nothing burger that people are going to interpret according to their pre-existing beliefs.
        
        All of the chat about the first amendment amuses me, though. As if the amendment is there to protect people spouting horse shit on Twitter.
        
        View Single #109420
  - Level 3
    
    Some Dems lied and said that the "10% for the Big Guy" was Russia Disinformation.
    
    NedoftheHill 47372 posts 1:42 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    The Left won't condemn their own "intelligence" people who did that...or their own use of the FBI to convince Facebook and Twitter to suppress free speech in an attempt to set aside the 1st Amendment. You won't condemn yourself for doing it.
    
    As for for me, all I can do is vote against Trump in the primary, and see what happens.
    
    Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
    
    View Single #109402
Level 1

They will all vote for him, once he wins the nomination

Chris94 39134 posts 11:03 pm on Dec 5, 2022

(no message)

View Single #109375
- Level 2
  
  You guys could fix that by nominating a more reasonable candidate. Is it really that hard to do?
  
  NedoftheHill 47372 posts 2:19 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  (no message)
  Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
  
  View Single #109406
- Level 2
  
  That is because he is still better than any Democratic alternative. Even Tulsi Gabbard knows this.
  
  THEISMANCARR 18111 posts 11:22 pm on Dec 5, 2022
  
  (no message)
  
  View Single #109378
Level 1

I'm voting for DeSantis. The wrinkled orange has outlived his usefulness.

fredyo 12582 posts 10:57 pm on Dec 5, 2022

Keep on rockin' in the free world

View Single #109373
- Level 2
  
  I think he's still useful.
  
  jabbadoody6 474 posts 12:56 am on Dec 6, 2022
  
  He's useful as a target. Let Trump take all the live rounds while Desantis continues to do good work and gain popularity. By the time the Dems figure out that DJT is a distraction, it will hopefully be too late for them to focus the slander machine on RD.
  
  View Single #109394
  - Level 3
    
    yeah, but, here's the real problem.
    
    und67 7143 posts 1:41 am on Dec 6, 2022
    
    if trump doesn't get the nomination, he could run as an independent. the conservative vote will be split. the dems will run away with it.
    
    we have to hope his ego won't interfere with good judgement and common sense.
    
    msm, dnc, antifa, blm: trying to kill america.
    
    View Single #109401
    - Level 4
      
      I stated that very idea to LanceH a week ago. He still thinks Trump will win the nomination...
      
      fredyo 12582 posts 2:25 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      Running as an Independent is poison but his other act of desperation is to argue that the GOP needs to go and if he's not nominated, then the MAGA followers should protest by staying home.
      
      This is gonna' get fugly.
      
      Keep on rockin' in the free world
      
      View Single #109407
    - Level 4
      
      I hate that more than I hate UConn women's basketball.
      
      jabbadoody6 474 posts 1:47 am on Dec 6, 2022
      
      (no message)
      
      View Single #109403

End of conversation