Our Nation is unhinged, can a teacher refuse to teach evolution theory and claim 1st amendment

lived about million years ago. Humans and apes have completed different evolutionary paths. This is just science 101. You may believe science, but you don't know science. You take science as religion. That's all. But people like you can easily be fooled and manipulated by science pastor, aka Mr "I am science".

First of all lets get your simplistic and inaccurate generalizations out of the way with me:
wrt evolution, I have no problems. I think it explains many things, and it is the most solid theory. You probably assume that it somehow conflicts with my religious beliefs, but it does not at all. But I also understand that it is still appropriately referred to as a "theory" because it doesn't explain everything. Even Newtonian physics did not explain everything. Thank goodness there weren't liberals in power to shut down scientific debate when Einstein introduced his theories on relativity! What really appears to be the case is that YOU feel that your religious beliefs are being challenged by the questioning of aspects of evolution. You are SO insecure that you can't even engage with people who present the other side of things.

Now, it's laughable that you would place mRNA immunization shots in the realm of certitude as evolution. Again, you and your liberal brethren have opposed debate from the start - even back when there was not sufficient study available as it turns out from Big Pharma testimony in Europe.
As you know, I have never been an antivaxxer, but nonetheless, to the liberals here I am perceived as such because I do not share their religious zealotry about it nor do I share the willingness to buy in on all of the politically motivated, nonsensical recommendations such as Shut Down or general masking with innadequate maks/inappropriate usage . Personally, I think that we can do a lot better than the shots being given right now....but it is harder to improve things when we have zealots such as you who prevent rational discourse and scientific debate.

Global warming? (I assume you want the more generalized Climate Change so that you won't ever be proven wrong at any point, right?). Again, this is a religious issue for you. You can brook no debate, yet this is the softest of all sciences....sociology/psychology/climatology/etc.
My take of Climate Change is not whether it exists but on whether the proposed nonsensical strategies with political side benefits will make any difference. Again, your own zealotry prevents you from carrying on serious debate here.

That teacher should absolutely be expected to teach about the theory of evolution. But he absolutely should NOT be forced to lie about it being absolute fact that is fully settled.