And with that, Closet Schitt and Fang Swalwell are out.
(no message)
Replies to: And with that, Closet Schitt and Fang Swalwell are out.
It's just part of the revenge
They investigated Trump.
It's just petty revenge politics.
Possible, but neither of them belong on this committee.
Regardless of the depth of the involvement (and his carefully crafted partial denials aren't convincing), Swalwell was compromised by a C.C.P. agent. Maybe she got nothing from him, but basic good judgment would lead you to keep him off a committee of this level of security clearance. That's just being prudent, and I don't accept any argument in favor of leaving him on as opposed to finding someone else who has been properly vetted.
As for Schitt, there seems to be a huge spectrum of opinions of him that vary from end to end, depending on people's political leaning. What we do know is that he's a liar who spent 4 years focusing solely on trying to undo the results of a valid election while we had multiple intelligence failures and perceptions of a lack of integrity within the I.C. He simply needs to be replaced with another congressperson who isn't such a polarizing figure among U.S. citizens and voters.
Horseshit. Complete petty ass revenge politics.
(no message)
I clearly said it's possible that was the motive. Doesn't change my point that they needed to go.
And if it bothers you more to view it that way, all the merrier for the rest of us.
And I say horseshit that either is unfit or compromised to serve on the committee.
(no message)
And of course, what you say has been demonstrated as false by actual historical events.
Unsurprising.
Swallow is clearly a Chinese asset. Schiff is just a liar.
No wonder you’re defending him.
That's because you want to be the meat in their sandwich.
(no message)
Whoa
McCarthy states his case…..
Schiff’s lies about the Nunes memo were particularly egregious. Naturally, the usual proggie lemmings here ate it up and dutifully regurgitated said lies. If I cared enough I’d pull some of their posts, but I don’t. They’re probably busy deleting them anyway.
Link: Ouch
McCarthy is a piece of shit. Nunes likely leaked classified info
in trying to cover for Trump’s tweet falsely claiming Obama administration spied DJT. He was to be investigated by the House Ethics Committee. All of Nunes defamation claims were overwhelmingly rebuked in court.
And McCarthy mispronunciation of Schiff’s name tells what a piece of shit he is and goes for all GOP who think they’re clever in doing so.
Schiff: "The lying, leaking clown". Looks like your the only one who actually believes him...
...the other libs all know that he's lying and leaking for their cause. Sounds you actually believe it.
As if their wasn't enough evidence already, the Twitter Dump on Schiff confirmed it all to the world. You just don't want to hear it.
Welp! what did he lie about and what did he leak? You all don't seem to have that answer.
Must be because you're a lying piece of shit too, just like Nunes and McCarthy.
Would you rather that we say "he either lied or he is incompetent?"
He clearly got a lot wrong, are you suggesting his apparent fails weren't lies, but instead incompetence?
When he went on TV and said he'd personally seen evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, do you think he was actually just misinterpreting "The Little Engine That Could?"
And you still are unable to provide his lies or what he leaked.
If you had any of that, you all would have posted it.
In other words, you all will invent lies and imbue facts with false narratives to win a conversation.
Really pathetic.
I'll play, buttercup. "Undoubtedly there is collusion'
I never said he lied. I asked you if you'd rather we say he is incompetent. He said there was collusion, and that it couldn't be doubted.
But it could be doubted couldn't it? It could be doubted because there was never any evidence of collusion (unless you want to count the fabricated evidence in the Steele Dossier). He got that wrong. Maybe it wasn't a lie. Maybe he just really sucked at his job.
Either way ya boy shit in your mouth, and you ate it up.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/undoubtedly-there-is-collusion-trump-antagonist-adam-schiff-doubles-down-after-mueller-finds-no-conspiracy/2019/03/26/e972d9e8-4fdd-11e9-a3f7-78b7525a8d5f_story.html
I guess you didn’t read the article.
(no message)
I take it comprehension is not you
strong suit, dumb ass
"Undoubtedly there is collision." Is that a true statement?
"Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank), who maintains that he’s seen evidence that Trump colluded with Russia."
Lap that shit up. Gargle it. Tell Daddy Schiff how much you like it.
Link: https://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-pol-russia-investigation-schiff-trump-20190327-story.html
He leaked urine. That is a fact.
(no message)
If you got into a pool noodle fight with Joe Biden, you wouldn't escape with your life.
(no message)
Incredible that he has to explain something so obvious.
Though he did explain it in incredible fashion. That's a fun video to watch
Adam Schitt has literally not made a single true statement for six years, at least.
The dude lied about everything to do with the Democrat Russia hoax.
But he has no tell!
He must have had plastic surgery to remove the muscles in his face.
He could lie to God Almighty with a perfectly straight face.
Oh yes he did. He was spot fookin on during the impeachment trial.
And all the petty moral cowards in the House GOP got their revenge today.
And the same petty moral cowards on this Board take delight. Like a bunch of 8th grade girls.
Link: Here is Truth
Twitter dumps proved he knew his claims were false.
(no message)
Maybe after he provides all that evidence he had on Russian collusion, he can re-join.
(no message)
Spoken like a true 4th grade girl.
(no message)
You're kidding, right?...even Gordon Sondland corroborated Schiff's "Quid Pro Quo" accusation...
Trump corruptly attempted to extort a political favor from Ukraine President Zelensky...that was absolutely true...problem is the GOP Senate believed that corruption was a "core value".
The truth hurts...your attempt to deflect can't stand up to the facts.
What other bogus claims have you got?...seriously...list them...can't wait to post responses.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/06/politics/trump-ukraine-quid-pro-quo-three-examples/index.html
Every statement from Schitt from 2016-2022 was a fabrication.
The most inveterate liar in the history of the United States
I think you mean the Big Guy.
(no message)
Glad you found time in-between your DQ Blizzards to grace us with that gem.
Your time would have been better spent cleaning out your chin folds.
LOL...you just had to say something, even if it was inane and totally lacking in substance ;-)
You have no self pride, Jabba...that much is clear.
Adam Schiff did a great job exposing DJT's corruption...I loved it when Rep. Maloney 'extracted' that 'Quid Pro Quo' admission from Gordon Sondland...Exquisite!
Look in the mirror.
(no message)
Did Adam Schiff speak the truth when he claimed that DJT tried to extract a "Quid Pro Quo" from
Ukraine's President Zelensky?...YES HE DID...as Trump's ambassador, Gordon Sondland, admitted...UNDER OATH...to the American public. That was the reason for impeachment and Rep. Schiff got it right.
Carry on with whatever random thoughts come into your mind, since focusing on the thread topic is too much to ask.
Bonehead response by you. Focus on the mirror. Do you see anything?
(no message)
OK, Hensou...I looked in the mirror ;-)...now, did Adam Schiff tell the truth about Donald Trump
using a "Quid Pro Quo" to extort a political favor from Ukraine's President Zelensky?
What did you see? Or do you just have Schiff for brains?
(no message)
I just thought I'd play along for a moment with you to see if you were really trolling...I was right
you are.
Nothing in your mirror. You lack existence.
(no message)
LOL...you just had to say something, even if it was inane and totally lacking in substance ;-)
(no message)
LOL...you just had to say something, even if it was inane and totally lacking in substance ;-)
(no message)
Perfect response and also Ty is incapable of understanding what it means.
He is an Apex idiot.
Do you have a list of the lies?
(no message)
Starter Set:
March 2017: “There is more than circumstantial evidence now” that Trump colluded with the Russians.
December 2017: “the Russians offered help. The campaign accepted that help. The President made full use of that help”.
April 2018: he claimed that the Nunes memo (which we now know is absolutely true) was “unsupported by the facts and the investigative record”.
Every one of these statements was a lie. And he knew they were lies based on the transcripts of the investigation that were later released.
He knew that the Steele Dossier was complete garbage paid for by the Clinton campaign. He knew it was used to improperly obtain FISA surveillance warrants on innocent men.
He claimed that an “army of Russian bots” was manipulating innocent Americans on Twitter. This, in spite of Knowing that Twitter itself had investigated and found nothing.
He is an evil bastard who did more harm to this nation than anyone else I can think of since 2016.
Remember how Schiff brought Deep Stater Sondland who had to change his testimony during impeachment?
(no message)
Link: https://nypost.com/2019/11/05/gordon-sondland-now-says-he-told-ukraine-official-aid-was-linked-to-biden-investigations/
Thanks, I don't think we should tolerate lying "to this extent".
(no message)
I am not a fan of Trump. But I wonder if his years would have been better
without the organized harassment of completely fabricated nonsense for his entire tenure. That's on Schitt and his partners in crime.
To many caricatures in post. Ops would not go for it
(no message)
He's an evil piece of garbage.
(no message)
Sure did, an inveterate liar.
(no message)
This is already getting fun.
McCarthy might surprise some people.
He's handling it more tactfully than many would.
But kudos to him for making the right calls.
I'd have them walked out with security guards.
(no message)
With a handcuff around Schiff's neck.
(no message)
It would fit with room to spare.
(no message)
Hahaha! Man I hate that POS!
(no message)