Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 10 posts
-
Level 1
Fucking misleading. He's not wrong. It's one sided. Why? He tried to make the author's point
more completely, i.e. it is 24×7 rhetoric from one side that wants to destroy the other side. If you call somebody "Hitler" 24x7 repeatedly, somebody will surely assassinate this "Hitler" one day. Musk's response has nothing to do with incitment to violence. It is about why violence of assassinations always happened on the other side. The whole thread of conversation is about this point.
-
Level 1
Waddabout this statement that didn't result in assassination attempts?!?!!??!!!!???
(no message)-
Level 2
Conversely,D “DT is threat to democracy speeches”didn’t incite violence,but DT J6“March peacefully”
BaronVonZemo 64346 postsspeech did.
A Whataboutism and at the same time a TotallyDifferentism (Rule of Liberalism #8).
The libbies are really twisting like pretzels on this one. They own it, and they don’t want it.
End of conversation