Jack Smith proved he’s just a political hack in reality yesterday. What’s funny is that
his releasing of new charges after being slapped down for at least the third time by the SCOTUS will impact no one’s voting decision,
At this point, the dude is a private citizen and Dem operative who is being treated by the media like he has standing.
He did this release (never done before within the election timeframe) to influence the ekection, and that was ever the Dems goal.
The charges are fake, and this behavior just further confirms it.
Replies to: Jack Smith proved he’s just a political hack in reality yesterday. What’s funny is that
Wow, you brought out the crazies. Jailing their political enemy is all they got.
(no message)
The courts have ruled Jack Smith does not have standing to make charges. Yet Dem DOJ ignores ruling
So much for the rule of law. But we knew this wasnever about anything except influencing the election, and private citizen Smith has now proved it.
TDS is real.
Mayor Adams and Sen. Menendez would like to differ with you on that...DJT has been indicted by
Grand Juries made up of random citizens...he will have legal counsel...and be judged by another group of random citizens. Trump will be provided with all the rights of any other U.S. citizen...let the process play out...after all, he seems to want to use that system...A LOT...in order to deal with political opponents...you should be happy to see the DOJ perform its function.
VonShitstain is a repeat medalist in Manic Lying!
(no message)
You Mean it won't impact your vote, MAGAcult member. Explain slapped down by SCOTUS.
You obviously know so much about the reason, Smith had to do this, right? You just forgot it was the demand
of SCOTUS to the lower court to have this done and to have a trial to show what type of crime
POSTUS has immunity for, right?
The charges are only fake if you deny the rule of law is important.
Nothing posted here will impact anyone's vote... and it's unlikely Smith's legerdemain will either.
Political nerds and DC politicos pay attention to this kabuki but most folks care about their economic future.
Hardly Kabuki unless you're talking about SCOTUS doing R's and djt's bidding.
What ends up being most astonishing is so many here claim to be smart (also assuming they have an ND degree) about all things
and yet would be most happy to put a self-serving, lazy, criminal fuckwad at the seat of power here in the US. And all claiming the
moral high-ground - And some of this includes you.
Harris may not be the end all be all as POTUS should she be elected but 2 things we know - - If djt is elected we know for certain -
the US will suffer greatly as well as the rest of the planet (0ur allies and NATO). He will likely trash the economy.
Will it be the end of democracy? Somewhat so but important, this country
will never have the same democracy given to us by the founding fathers. Altered in a way that it will probably set us up for an eventual
fall of this country to an autocracy in the next years to come
-- the other is if Harris is elected, she's going to make a few
head scratching mistakes but she will not alter our democracy, she will work for this country 24/7 and won't trash the economy.
But the too clever by half on this board are too stupid to realize, you don't need to be a Democrat to vote for Harris or change your
conservative beliefs, you just have to be smart and put a stop to a dumbass, fuckwad criminal mob boss wanna be in office.
I will actually be very "pleased" to see Kamala elected IF AND ONLY IF Congress stays Republican.
HE will be GONE and she will be harmless.
Looking at the polls I suspect a majority is with me.
Then it will be genuine Kabuki in DC and the country can run itself.
DJT was indicted long ago...SCOTUS asked for only non-Presidential examples of crime, so JS complied
...oh, and the Supremes didn't say "Wait Until After The Election For Your Reply".
Direct evidence comments by Trump, like "You're TOO HONEST" to Mike Pence are things that the American public ought to know...especially before accidentally voting in someone who tried to overthrow our democracy...as an American, wouldn't you agree?
Get off your knees Doctor. Trump is not God, and making him yours diminishes you.
(no message)
Baron sold his soul long ago to someone who makes a mockery of morals and ethics...not sure how he
justifies that.
Some how I get the impression that Baron is more moral than most. And I think you are pretty genuine
in your beliefs but just happen to be wrong.
We don't elect politicians based on morals or ethics, but on the basis of what they will do for us.
I voted for Democrats for decades when they were true liberals and I never cared about their personal lives.
And I rarely believed those who ran on "family values" platforms.
It's kinda like voting by pro-abortion Catholics or pro-Trump evangelicals.
Have you not seen and heard the reasons why millions of Evangelical Christians + Pro-Life Catholics
are voting for DJT?...do you think for one moment that Baron is not one of them?...hence the gross level of hypocrisy on his part. Your personal anecdotal view doesn't eliminate that reality, Curly.
I feel confidant you will find a link to support this... but let's see how they actually vote.
They like SCOTUS as it is now and do not want to see it changed.
Again, Baron must have thousands of posts here that extol his claim to the moral high-ground, yet he
goes to great lengths extolling someone with morals and ethics at the "Zero Degree Kelvin" scale...mind boggling...if you want links to prove that, do an OF Search with his name ...
btw, don't let me catch you using any links from here on out...;-)
Bless his innocent heart, Baron is a saint. And links should be used as seasoning only. :)
(no message)
Are you going to start your own set of "Rules"?...e.g. limits for how "Liberally" one 'Seasons'
their posts? ;-)...you should quit before you fall too far behind on that one, especially given your chosen field that relies heavily on "Links" to relevant cases.
No rules... or limitations on critiques.
(no message)
Excellent...then I take it you really don't have a problem with me using links as often as I choose.
...much appreciated.
Read the unsealed filling (and proffered evidence) and then repost.
Tell us if you endorse the conduct of a sitting President to endeavor to overturn the electoral verdict.
That’s your guy, Baron.
It has nothing to do with politics.
The filing of a private citizen Democrat partisan with no standing per the courts.
Or don’t you believe in court rulings anymore, counselor?