Tim Walz wants to do away with the Electoral College and pack the Supreme Court.
(no message)
Link: https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/1843787617130950806
Replies to: Tim Walz wants to do away with the Electoral College and pack the Supreme Court.
Liberalism Rule #6: "When we lose, change the rules".
(no message)
Somehow managing to outperform Kamala as the dumbest person in the race
(no message)
Everybody knows Rs packed the Court. Stupid post.
(no message)
Every state has large and small counties, but no "Electoral College" when voting for Governor...
...there is no need for a national Electoral College...even the smallest state gets 2 Senators...just like the largest.
The Electoral College was created to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.
The Federal Government is there to serve the states — not the other way around. All of it’s powers derive from the limited enumerated powers granted by the states.
Correct. Just don't claim that your candidates represent the will of the people. More like the will
of cows and states made up of national parks.
And those states don’t care about the threat of “Tyranny” within their own
Boundaries?…doesn’t wash…
btw, any response to my question regarding abortion?
Actually your hero wanted to do away with the EC a while back. Until he learned he would never win a
majority of votes nationwide. Moron. And Orange and Mitch have already packed SCOTUS.
Glad to hear Trump has seen the light. Assume you agree on that limited point?
No one packed SCOTUS. Appointing justices as the Constitution allows, without expanding the court, is not packing. None of those appointments were unprecedented. Similar appointments were made in the past under similar circumstances (upcoming election).
It is disingenuous to call that "packing" without telling everyone that you are changing the definition of the term.
It’s packing when you first say that the appointment needs to await an election a year off and then
later appoint another one on the eve of another election. When did that ever happen before?
Disagree. What the GOP did is politics, and it has precedent. Packing is what FDR threatened to do.
FDR was going to change the very structure of the court in order to immediately place on the court a majority of his own choosing.
Hmm, pack the Supreme Court? Didn’t know Walz was a Republican.
(no message)
I doubt Tim Walz can explain the Electoral College. I doubt he can even say how many electors
Minny-soda has. As his own brother has stated, he shouldn't be in charge of anything.
That's why he's perfect for the job.
(no message)
All Dems do, so they can rule the country by winning a few cities. Then, the Hunger Games can begin.
(no message)
A few cities? How about 7 million more voters last time? And by the way, cities are where people
live. MAGA EC votes come from cows and open space owned mostly by the govt because each state starts out with 3 no matter its population.
I don’t comment much here. But this sounds elitist. The views of the people that supply the food to
Your grocery stores are no less important than large metropolitan areas. They are vital to the very existence of city dwellers. The fact is, very few countries have such diverse living experiences. There is no reason that the State of California, with its large population should dictate how someone in Montana lives without winning the electoral college. It would disenfranchise the fly over states. The Electoral college is integral to protecting the minority from the majority. You may not like it because a particular side won or lost. But it will protect you when you suddenly become the minority voter. It’s genius has been lost on education geared toward teaching to the lowest common denominator.
The State of California has many rural areas. So do other blue states. I wouldn’t change the EC.
It’s a trade off made by people wiser than me. Just don’t say it represents the will of the people when a prez candidate can lose by 5 million votes or more and be elected.