So Trump won Iowa by 13 pts, how did the experts get it so wrong?
(no message)
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 11 posts
-
Level 1
But I was told she (the pollster) was SO well-respected".
BaronVonZemo 64336 postsThat's code words for "Democrat".
-
Level 1
As always, they were trying to steer results to their liking
They don't care about being wrong in hindsight. In the moment, they're trying to manufacture a result.
-
Level 2
for starters, they're not "experts". they're influencers. never trust them.
(no message)msm, dnc, antifa, blm: trying to kill america.
-
-
-
Level 1
The media is corrupt. You may already know that the reporter behind that poll
is the same reporter who decided not to release the poll that showed Bernie Sanders beating Hillary in Iowa because she didn’t want to hurt Hillary’s campaign.
-
Level 2
She also predicted Orange wins in 16 and 20. How does it help her reputation to publish a false
poll that she knows is wrong?
-
Level 3
The media doesn’t care about its credibility. It only cares about setting the narrative.
(no message)-
Level 4
Not a pollster with at least a past reputation for being accurate. She looks bad right now and that
is bad for business.
-
-
-
Level 2
Did not know that, but I find it interesting that the media doesn't understand how credibility works
Given that it's core to their line of business, you'd think they would learn the obvious lessons.
-
End of conversation