Democrat funder of the Steele Dossier denying the Pennsylvania election...trying to force recount.
Do any Dems condemn their side for doing this?
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 18 posts
-
Level 1
It’s an automatic recount BY LAW if the margin is .5% or
lower unless the campaign that’s behind doesn’t want it. Not even close to what Orange did last time.
-
Level 2
He is an election denier by the definition of the Left. And, a proven liar & a fraud.
Unless you have a different standard for the Right than you do the Left...in which case, I guess you can say whatever you want without regard to being fair and consistent.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.-
Level 3
Bullshit. An election denier is one claiming fraud without evidence and making baseless claims
about it after the legal recount has happened. You are doing your normal conflation shuffle.
-
Level 4
So, you trust the known liar and fraudster because he is a Leftist. Got it.
No need to keep harping on about it. We understand where you stand.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.-
Level 5
You understand nothing about election law or election denialism. You do understand conflation.
By the way is that the royal “we”?
-
Level 6
I do understand double standards.
One side says "find the votes" it's ok. The other side says "find the votes" it means jail time. That's called a double standard. You can try the old "This is totally different" thing, but everyone sees what is going on.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.-
Level 7
No you don’t. No double standard in going forward with a recount authorized by statute. Plenty wrong
with claiming fraud and a stolen election without evidence and trying to stay in power illegally
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 3
Piggies as usual without any logical response.
Will be waiting for the excuses for Orange’s decline after he takes office.
-
-
-
-
Level 1
Heard the last 4 yrs. this was being an election denier and a threat to democracy
(no message) -
End of conversation