CNN not well at all.
Replies to: CNN not well at all.
Only MSNBC is more deserving. They lied about Trump and about Biden’s competency.
(no message)
a news company that doesn’t report news has few viewers. 🤔
(no message)
Sadly, CNN is the only US news agency commonly available in Europe.
Imagine CNN as your only source of news about America.
IMO...CNN tried to 'straddle the fence' in an effort to gain more viewers...but they weren't "MAGA"
enough for Conservatives...and TOO MAGA for Liberals. Again IMO, Jake Tapper is a prime example of that 'No Win' position.
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cnn-getting-more-republicans-on-air-it-seeks-political-diversity-2023-05-18/
Tried to straddle? Wow!
(no message)
(no message)
In trying to destroy Trump, CNN destroyed itself.
(no message)
Joe Rogan gained millions of subscribers after they tried to destroy him.
Cancel culture is dead.
Wokeism is dead.
Corporate media is dead.
Fox News rules cable news, as it should. Americans don't like fake, woke news.
(no message)
Yeah, let's all just forget the $787M settlement for knowingly lying to you...and never apologizing.
your post is a prime example of what's called "Projection"...good grief...all day, every day ;-)
What evdence do you have of "knowingly lying?" Liability is not admitted to in a settlement nor is
an apology given. Below you tasked someone to distinguish between opinion and evidence. I would agree that paying $787M, much of it probably paid by thier insurance carriers (my opinion) suggests that they opined that they may have some liability (I opine they did have some liability but I have no evidence as to how much) so they reached a settlement rather than going to trial.
He be dumb.
(no message)
LOL...You be dumb for choosing to be lied to.
(no message)
C'mon, JH...push the throttles forward...fire up you preferred Search Engine and type in keywords
"Dominion" and "FOX"...you'll get lots of articles, but the easiest to interpret, and the one with the most references is 'Wikipedia'...here's an excerpt from the attached Wiki Page...
-----------------
Dominion focused on allegations made between November 2020 and January 2021 by hosts Maria Bartiromo, Tucker Carlson, Lou Dobbs, Sean Hannity, and Jeanine Pirro. Guests who often appeared with these hosts included Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, both of whom have also been sued individually by Dominion in federal court.[a] During pre-trial discovery, Fox News' internal communications were released, indicating that prominent hosts and top executives were aware the network was reporting false statements but continued doing so to retain viewers for financial reasons.
In a summary judgment on March 31, 2023, Delaware Superior Court judge Eric M. Davis ruled that none of the disputed statements Fox News made about Dominion were true and ordered a trial to determine if the network had acted with actual malice.Several prominent Fox News personalities and senior executives were expected to testify at trial.
On April 18, 2023, as opening statements were about to begin, the judge announced that the parties had reached a settlement. Fox News agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million and acknowledged the court's earlier ruling that Fox had broadcast false statements about Dominion. The settlement did not require Fox News to apologize. It is the largest known media settlement for defamation in U.S. history.
-----------------
If anyone needs more detail...I invite you to delve into the references, or research the court documentation yourself....Bottom Line....FOX Knowingly Lied to its viewers and readers...perhaps the most egregious example of failed journalism...ever...and given the clear alliance with a political figure (DJT), a blatant example of Propaganda.
The Huge question is why FOX viewers and readers are not outraged by this knowledge?...and more deeply, why do they not seek the truth on their own?
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_Systems_v._Fox_News_Network
Ty, you are a broken record and a nuisance. Go back to your re-education camp.
(no message)
Translation:..."I don't want to hear the truth anymore...it's embarrassing me". I'm going to keep on
repeating the truth until you and others acknowledge it...after all, that's what we all should be seeking...Right?...who wants to waste time going down wrong paths?
You only spew leftist propaganda.
The fact that you cannot discern it from the truth is very telling.
FOX knowingly lied to its viewers/readers and has to write a check for $787M to Dominion...and they
have not apologized...I know real propaganda when I see it.
He absolutely refused to answer a simple hypothetical question about voting for Trump
The premise was that if he were convinced Trump's policies would leave us better off in four years than Kamala's, would he vote for Trump. And if not, why would you vote to leave the country worse off.
He just kept saying Trump's policies were going to be more destructive. I said yes, I know you believe that, but play along that you don't.
He just couldn't do it.
Sorry, Mark...but you need to stop "Playing Games" and focus on the real world...objectively, DJT's
economic policies, if implemented, will lead us into Inflation and reduced GDP...that's not good for anyone...including you.
btw, heard anything lately from Dr. Risch?
You keep proving his point, while pretending not to do so. Just answer his question.
(no message)
He has no point…Trump has already stated his economic priorities…and Nobel economists give them
a “Thumbs Down”…why would any rational person waste time “Playing Games”…maybe you…but not me.
My point is obvious yet you can't bring yourself to answer. We all know why
Yes, we all know you in fact believe Trump's policies weren't as good as Kamala's. But I know you also realize it would be in our country's best interests to vote for the candidate who would leave the country better off in four years, even if that candidate were Trump.
For the record, if I believed Kamala's policies would leave us better off in four years, she would have received my vote. See how easy this is?
But you're too wedded to being prideful...as also witnessed by your refusal to read Dr. Risch's paper. It's unfortunate keeping your pride intact is more important to you than intellectual honesty.
Mark, the basis of your Strawman argument is I would believe Trump's policies are good ones...that's
patently untrue...btw, given that I took electives in Finance for my MBA that included Macro Economics, I can appreciate the reasoning behind all those Nobel Prize Winning Economists' conclusion that Trump's policies would leave the country worse off.
What makes you think Trump's policies would leave us better off?...btw, keep in mind that several of his businesses went bankrupt and one year he lost a billion dollars...then fought tooth and nail to hide his tax returns. Would you choose Trump to take care of your finances given that record?
You make poor choices, Mark...like Dr. Risch's push for HCQ that no HC system would even consider. I'm just trying to help you make better ones...seriously.
Plenty of doctors did - and still are - using HCQ+ with great success
You lack the knowledge to weigh in on the HCQ+ debate. It has been explained to you over and over why it was incorrectly shot down as a treatment but you refuse to listen.
You also completely miss the point of my Donald Trump question (well, actually you don't), so let's try a different tack on that.
Let's say Trump's policies were actually different and you were thus convinced he would leave the country better off four years from now. Would you still vote for Harris in that scenario?
You can postulate "What If's" until the cows come home ;-)...he has already stated his policies and
they are not good for our economy...why do you resist?
On doctors backing HCQ...the VAST MAJORITY of physicians do not even consider its use for COVID-19...yet, there are always a few who don't follow sound medical practices...that that's why ~4K of them each year get reprimanded by their state Medical Boards...some even losing their licenses. You should seek established medical practices when making health care decisions for you and your family.
So your pride is more important than intellectual honesty. Got it
And your lack of critical reasoning skills are showing once again with your view on HCQ+.
You've got that reversed...I've got the considered opinion of every health care system on my side...
you've got a Doc's Opinion paper which includes studies that were acknowledged to be faulty by their own authors...
You can keep betting on the lottery, but that's not how rational people conduct their lives.
This ^^^^^
(no message)
I agree. He’s a bore and a delusional Uber-lib.
(no message)
I was under the impression that you decided to ignore what I had to say ;-)...guess you can't
be counted on to follow through on your own commitments...or keep a Username...you're such a weakling.