Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 17 posts
-
Level 1
Did she watch it going on and for how long, or film it too without at least fake coughing?
(no message) -
Level 1
The Kavanaugh smear machine is running again. If professional legal officers dont believe you,
don't worry, you go to talk to politicians. They will believe you. Christine Blasey Ford set a good example for you.
-
Level 2
Moron. It may not have been illegal, Chicom jackass. The age of consent here is 16.
The issue is did he violate his Congressional ethics and do we want that as AG.
-
-
-
Level 2
They will Kavanaugh every candidate they don't like. This time is worse, using a closed DOJ case.
(no message) -
-
-
-
Level 5
Impeach Garland. They interviewed the “witness” and declined to bring charges.
If you think the witness who made the woke DOJ refuse to take a tilt at the second most hated Republican in America is going to help your campaign…well, you are even dumber than I had previously given you credit for being. Suck on the loss, loser.
-
Level 6
They didn’t have enough evidence to bring trafficking charges. Having sex with an underage minor
of that age is not a federal crime, but would constitute an ethics violation as would lying to Congress about it. Your mail in law degree doesn’t cover that this isn’t a criminal probe. It’s an inquiry into his fitness to be AG, and before that, whether he should be expelled from Congress for ethical violations. Like I said, try the Widener night program to educate yourself better.
-
Level 7
Sure sure. Garland DOJ would decline to refer locally or leak details of sex with a minor
Temple, Dickinson, Widener, or whatever third rate school let your 2.9 ass in must be proud.
You lose, again.
-
Level 8
It’s not a crime locally either you dip shit. You are one clueless mo fo. Doubt Widener would even
take you. It’s an ethics issue dumbass.
-
Level 9
Somehow, this moron still doesn't understand why the DOJ wouldn't even leak about this "witness".
Amusing!
-
Level 10
There have been tons of leaks about the 17 year old victim, idjit. As I said, one clueless excuse
making mo fo who can’t admit when he was absolutely wrong.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
End of conversation