A deeper look at Trump's nominee for Director of National Intelligence...Tulsi Gabbard...
Extreme Homophobic...Cult member...Russian 'agent'...without any national intelligence experience. Amazing how DJT keeps coming up with cabinet choices that would leave Vladimir Putin jumping for joy.
Replies to: A deeper look at Trump's nominee for Director of National Intelligence...Tulsi Gabbard...
This video reminds me of one of those crime shows where
The evidence seems overwhelming in pointing to the person's guilt, only for the person to actually be innocent.
That’s an interesting fantasy…can you disprove any of what Rachel presented?
(no message)
Now THERE'S a credible opinionist that everyone can get behind!
(no message)
Rachel backs up her opinion with documented evidence...can you contradict anything she presented?...
Tulsi Gabbard has a long history of being a Homophobe, Cultist, and admirer of our nation's worst enemy, who actively strives to destroy America...not make it Great.
Given her evidence, don't you think there are better choices for DNI?
You still don't get it. Evidence without cross-examination is worthless. Remember Cassidy Hutchinson
whom you went hog wild over and claiming she was believable? Read the latest report from the house of reps. re Jan 6.
Can you refute anything that Rachel Maddow presented?…if not, it doesn’t
Paint a picture of the ideal DNI candidate…not by a million miles.
As for Cassidy Hutchinson, her testimony would be compelling to any jury…but she was just one Republican, of many who testified under oath as to what really happened on…and before…Jan. 6th. You’ve got to know that was a planned insurrection attempt. The man should be in prison right now for the rest of his life.
No one wants to watch an established liar.
It would be like asking you to refute something Sean Hannity or Alex Jones said.
Give us examples...with substantive backup that proves any suspected lying. When you're done with
that, let's open the book on lying by the person you think is a credible source...i.e. Donald J. Trump...or perhaps his prime media source...FOX.
You're completely insane.
(no message)
It was all dramatized made-up crap. Unsurprised it captivated you.
(no message)
Really...Which parts? ;-)
(no message)
100% of it She's a lesbian Alex Jones. Only morons follow her.
(no message)
You still don't get it. Evidence without cross-examination is worthless. Remember Cassidy Hutchinson
whom you went hog wild over and claiming she was believable? Read the latest report from the house of reps. re Jan 6.
All of it. She's a pathological, psycopathic liar.
(no message)
Did she lie at all about Tulsi Gabbard?
(no message)
Trump’s probably going to put her in a concentration camp. Maybe AOC in jail to.
(no message)
Link: https://nypost.com/2024/06/11/media/rachel-maddow-worried-trump-will-send-her-to-camps-if-elected/
Sounds like the kind of dangerous misinformation that Tyrone and the left want to criminalize.
Clearly, Free Speech should not cover this.
Migrants first Muskeroo. He has priorities.
(no message)
Maddow. Haha. The one that told her/his viewers if you get the COVID shot
you can’t get it or spread it. Good thing no one watches her/him and listened to that lie. Well, except you.
Can you contradict anything she presented?...are those the qualities you want to see in our DNI?
(no message)
She’s a Russian agent. We better be careful
(no message)
Russian "Stooge" might be a better term...according to TG's own staffers...
(no message)
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-own-ex-staffers-171010292.html
Thanks. I’ll sleep better tonight knowing this.
(no message)
Wow...that doesn't even register with you?...must be nice in that MAD Magazine world of
yours..."What, Me Worry?"
I'm uneasy with Tulsi in this position. She just seems like an idealistic lightweight.
We need someone more objective about Realpolitik.
She’s a nut which makes her well qualified for the next administration.
(no message)
She has her own cult guru and it isn’t even Orange.
(no message)
I'd hit it (Tulsi - not that dude with the QTip head).
(no message)
There's a reason no one watches that.
Except shitlibs of course.
Link: https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/media/msnbcs-rachel-maddows-ratings-plummet-43-since-trumps-election-day-victory/
Do not click this link if an image of Rachal Maddow offends you.
(no message)
Hiding from the truth is not what intelligent people do...but clearly what defines Trump followers.
...if there's a claim someone makes on this Forum that doesn't sound right, I definitely make a point of checking out what they post, and more often than not it provides evidence that proves them wrong...Baron is a great example. So, rise above your fears and see what others have to say...or remain ignorant.
Unintelligent people also make assumptions like you do about poster on this Board… just saying.
(no message)
Your refusal to take in documented evidence is hiding from the truth...and not very smart since
it keeps you from making good decisions about the world around you.