CNN guilty of intentionally slandering an innocent vet to push their narrative.
Replies to: CNN guilty of intentionally slandering an innocent vet to push their narrative.
"The high prices were due to high demand, Young said."...sounds like something an Extortionist might
say in his own defense. Nonetheless, a jury of his peers agreed with his suit...the same process that will play out when Trump stands trial for federal offenses after he leaves office...and the same one that found him guilty of 34 Felonies in NY.
Link: https://www.reuters.com/legal/cnn-found-liable-defaming-us-navy-veteran-who-helped-people-evacuate-afghanistan-2025-01-17/
CNN settled with plaintiff not wanting to face the same jury for punitive damages trial after having
openned its books. Neither judge or defendant would provide details of the settlement amount.
It appears that Mr. Young was anything but a "Mother Teresa" when dealing with the plight of Afghani
families who aided and supported U.S. forces for 20 years...not sure the Afghan War veterans who constantly urged the Trump administration to get as many of them out as possible would have appreciated Mr. Young's actions...oh, and while we're on the subject of evacuating people who saved American lives, let' not forget that DJT's 'Plan' was to have ZERO Afghanis airlifted out...in contrast to JB getting over 180,000 to safe havens around the world.
BTW, don't forget the question involving Trump's linkage to Putin from earlier today...
Oops, diversion, otherwise someone will bring up the withdrawal.
(no message)
What diversion?...CNN accused Young of working with companies that charged exorbitant fees to
get Afghanis out of the country...thus "Profiteering" and leaving many behind...even Mr. Young admitted the fees were high...'due to high demand'. Such instances weren't standard practice for other evacuations of Afghanis. C'mon, you know the guy is dirty.