With DJT becoming more open to having non-MAGAs join him for dinner, perhaps Jon Stewart will get an
invite shortly so they can have fun talking about "Tariffs"...and maybe discover what's really going on...and why...
Replies to: With DJT becoming more open to having non-MAGAs join him for dinner, perhaps Jon Stewart will get an
Good stuff, thanks for sharing.
(no message)
Your malignant narcissism diagnosis took a huge hit with Bill's revelations.
In fact, it destroyed your diagnosis and you are understandably frustrated.
Eliminating your biases and modifying your media consumption may save you from such embarrassment in the future.
All I’m seeing is a headline…where’s the substance?
Pardon me…thought you were talking about Clinton’s solution to our debt crisis…
Bill Maher has never liked what Notre Dame and many other institutions of higher learning champion …I.e. DEI…plus he wants to be accepted by the MAGA audience…
Note that DJT has done a Phenomenal Job of hiding his “Humanity” ;-)
No, Maher exists in the band of sanity between you and MAGA.
(no message)
Watch the OP video…then try to substantiate the sanity of anything
Trump and his brigade of clowns are perpetrating.
You’re a moron, its people like you who are not open to other viewpoints. You are the problem.
(no message)
You are correct. After all this time he still refuses to read Dr. Risch's paper
because it would open his eyes to what a disaster his boy the Great Fauchino is.
"Concerns About the Special Article on Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in High Risk Outpatients
with COVID-19 by Dr. Harvey Risch"...written by Risch's Co-Editorial Board Members at the American Journal of Epidemiology two months before I joined the UHND Open Forum...here's the abstract...and another (likely futile) attempt to try and help you make better decisions...
------------------
Abstract
In May, this journal published an opinion piece by one of the members of the Editorial Board, Dr. Harvey Risch, that reviewed several papers and argued that using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin (AZ) early to treat symptomatic COVID-19 cases in high-risk patients should be broadly applied. As members of the journal's editorial board, we are strongly supportive of open debate in science, which is essential even on highly contentious issues. However, we must also be thorough in our examination of the facts and open to changing our minds when new information arises. In this commentary, we document several important errors in the manuscript by Dr. Risch, review the literature he presented and demonstrate why it is not of sufficient quality to support scale up of HCQ+AZ, and then discuss the literature that has been generated since his publication, which also does not support use of this therapy. Unfortunately, the current scientific evidence does not support HCQ+AZ as an effective treatment for COVID-19, if it ever did; and even suggests many risks. Continuing to push the view that it is an essential treatment in the face of this evidence is irresponsible and harmful to the many people already suffering from infection.
------------------
As Albert Einstein wrote..."Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"...carry on Sr. Quixote.
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7499476/
Speak to the video...if you think JS got anything wrong, spell it out. btw, take a moment to
digest what Mr. Lutnik had to say about the 'End Result' of DJT's Tariff "Strategy"...i.e. the future for American workers...even he admits that we're NOT going back to the 1950's.
Spend just a bit of your brain power on Critical Thinking and trying to understand what's going on around you...your one-liner invectives aren't cutting it.
I watched it, you’re still a moron.
(no message)
Be a little more specific...what exactly did you find to be in error...and what proof do you provide
to substantiate such claim(s)?