E.g., we can always come to the aid of Europe, but current membership in this dated, anti-Soviet treaty organization encourages Europe not to defend itself, and instead to just be a dependent of the US, while judging us and denying us access as if we are not members.
I'm not arguing for this position...yet. But, there are some valid points to this position that at least merit discussion.
Link: Withdrawal is not isolationism; it is the maneuver required to win in the generations of war ahead.
need important/rare minerals from other nations...but alliances to hold in check enemies who would otherwise run roughshod over us without them. We are strong, but not invulnerable...as the current situation in the Strait of Hormuz shows all too clearly.
There have been "America First" advocates throughout our history...thank heaven we've also had intelligent leaders to keep them at bay.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The Euros don’t want to fight the only real threat to them in Europe and don’t want to help us fight a terrorist regime that haz been killing Americans for 50 years. Let them enjoy their quaint cultural traditions in peace and forget about them.
(no message)
...I wouldn't expect someone who still thinks the Soviets are our enemies to take anything other than a pro-NATO position.
(no message)
But you supported my point. You have yet to get over the Soviets.
If you don’t see similarities between Russia and the Cold War Soviet Union, you’re either blind or dumb. Take a second and absorb my superior intellect. You continually post stupid shit. I’m sure you’re a nice enough guy…at least that’s what Baron said, but I question your mental acuity.
Consent Management