in 2015?...along with the 'un-freezing' of billions in Iranian assets?

Let this settle in for just a moment...then look at all the recent death, destruction, and chaos...including U.S. lives and resources...


Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/22/vance-iran-nuclear-inspectors-00969737

The US needs to be able to go anywhere it wants in Iran at any time to verify that the Mullahs have not restarted their nuke program... which they NEVER abandoned.

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://www.gatech.edu/news/2025/07/20/how-worlds-nuclear-watchdog-monitors-facilities-around-world-and-what-it-means-iran

They are really, really good.

And don’t think we (and the Israelis) don’t have great intel assets all over that program.

damaged by Iran’s attack? Did Ukraine or Russia allow a neutral party to inspect their military bases or facilities damaged during the war? If Iran allows IAEA inspectors to access nuclear sites struck by the U.S., that would be a very rare exception if not unprecedented.

I know your superficial understanding is from partisan propaganda which targets people without critical thinking.

I am just talking about the face value of this news as you do. I don’t really know if it is true that Iran allows IEAEA to come in. As far as I know Iranian hardliners strongly against any deal. So the current peace is pretty fragile.

program in the linked document.

As for my understanding, I'm not a nuclear physicist, but I have an Engineering Masters Degree with a focus on Energy technologies, especially Nuclear...plus 10 years of work experience in the Nuclear Power field as both an engineer and Program Manager for Fast and Thermal Reactors...i.e. I understand more than most people do about this subject.


Link: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran/iaea-and-iran-iaea-board-reports...

The JCPOA tripled the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran. They had full access to any site.

The Iranians could delay the inspections, but HEU is detectable in the environment for a year, so that made no difference.

You’re wrong here.

I am intellectually honest enough to be able to call balls and strikes as they are. This war was a disaster and tearing up the previous agreement was a disaster.

You might want to take a page from Chris. He's intellectually honest enough to call balls and strikes, too.

Iran is not trustworthy, so that is a great benefit.

Also, I was under the impression that future inspections will be at choice of US/IAEA, not at choice of Iran.

Also, no sunset provision like in JCPOA, which would have expired by now.

But, it really is too early to tell what the final deal will be, so Tyrone needs to get his criticisms in now when he can criticize a non-agreement (like they were doing weeks ago). Regardless, if the new deal gives Iran a path to nuclear weapons like the JCPOA, I also will criticize it.

(no message)

Mission Accomplished!

(no message)

through physical inspection within Iran that their only nuclear program would be to provide 3.67% enriched Uranium fuel for Thermal Nuclear Reactors that power their nation's electric power grid...which the IAEA inspectors verified. It was only AFTER Trump ripped the document up that Iran produced over 900 lbs of 60% enriched Uranium. So, as the attached IAEA document explains, the world could be assured that so long as the JCPOA was in effect, Iran would not be capable of producing a Nuclear Weapon.

As for "Sunset Provisions", the same levers that brought about the JCPOA in the first place (e.g. Sanctions and Frozen Assets) could be ramped up should Iran choose not to continue with it...all without loss of life, or economic chaos for all nations. Note that we could have then...and could still now...offer options for U.S. assistance (with continued IAEA oversight) to Iran in building out a peaceful nuclear power energy strategy...thus toning down the "Death to America" chants and maybe even find a pathway to Peace in the ME...just my thoughts.

Lets hope current negotiations head more in that direction, than the one Trump chose at the beginning of this needless war.


Link: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-now-has-more-inspection-powers-in-iran-increased-knowledge-of-its-nuclear-programme-director-general

for their Criminal acts...along with posts that strongly oppose far-left advocates of 'Renewable' energy sources only for our nation's future energy strategy (see attached link of one such post)

Not sure why you persist in your easily debunked home-grown trope...and I'm still waiting for your apology regarding your repeated false challenge to the veracity of the NEJM's detailed study of Masking Effectiveness in Boston Area Schools...i.e. 2 Districts out of 72...how about demonstrating that "Intellectual Honesty" you claim to have.


Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=109212

That's a ridiculous defense.

Not once, not ever, have you criticized any Democrat anywhere for any policy-related position or their belief system, or any action that they took that might have failed or not been the best course of action.

I believe I asked you before if you could at least bring yourself to give Trump credit for one thing, one thing that you surely would agree with: The commuting of the life sentence handed out to Alice Marie Johnson. No, you couldn't bring yourself to even do that, because to do so would violate your weird code you and too many strong partisans adhere to.

I don't understand that weird code, but unfortunately too many from all sides of the aisle adhere to it. By doing so, you and everyone adhering to this code are by definition unable to engage with any sort of intellectual honesty at all.

who is a maybe is or maybe not criminal - he is a convicted criminal - he has been convicted in a civil trial for sexual abuse - larceny, theft from students in a fraudulent university, theft from charities he founded, lies as he breathes, fomented an insurrection - a constant betrayal of his vows as a husband (for all you overly moral Christian’s out there). And this POTUS is not the only easy to criticize poll out there who claim to be a republican. And the big fat zero from you nut jobs. You put up and endorse people like Hershel Walker who though was a standout athlete is as dumb as a rock pile but because Dr orange Jesus endorsed him, as a great candidate. Almost unanimous you all back someone like MTG, you support another dumbass know-nothing in Tubberville and many number of candidates whose false valor resumes are pointed out - Tina Peters is another of your supported criminals.

The point is, when D’s are liars and criminals, we say so. By you saying we don’t or don’t do it loud enough - the proof is, they don’t stay in office or are candidates for office very long even though you nut jobs continue to lie about it.

It’s you MAGANUTS who support, promote, and defend the truly corrupt in office shouting it’s the D’s not the other way around.

should include Only Renewable Sources, like Wind, Solar, Hydro...which I oppose (read the archived UHND post)...you lose...now apologize...and while you're at it, I'm still waiting for your apology on the false statement you made about the NEJM study on Masking Effectiveness in the Boston School Area...again you fail to uphold your claim of Intellectual Honesty...do it now and the slate will be clean.

Btw, you're now changing the Goal Posts with the reference to DJT pardoning a Felon...not going down that Rabbit Hole...Just apologize and we can get on with discussions of other matters.

is steeped in fact. It’s what ever they imagine to be true.

(no message)