(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
but no substance.
(no message)
meaningless Lib BS. You are making yourself look really bad. You must be Basil in disguise.
If you can refute the facts in the article, give it a shot. Otherwise, you are making an ass out of yourself. But, Libs tend to so that.
because police officers killed unarmed black men.
It's a statement or opinion piece (of shit) with no stats or facts that can be attributed to Obama.
If anything, Obama's Presidency has put the limelight on the thug racists like you. You are all having a temper tantrum now for eight years - along with the GOP. Joe Wilson as your poster child. It's been an itch you've wanted scratched for some time now and now you're happier than a pig in shit.
what race am I and what races does your feeble anti-American Commie mind think that I dislike due to race.
(no message)
understand that you are what my wife would call a low student. Get someone to help you.
and what races does your feeble anti-American Commie mind think that I dislike due to race."
Well now, lets analyze this - Hmmm, you ask what race are you if you're a racist - My post asks "Wait, you're now going to tell us you're a black man?..."
And now you say in this next post - "I never said what my race was" - Did you change race during this exchange?
Well, I still don't believe you're a vet (military that is - US) and now you're telling us someone actually married you and she's a "teacher"? Did I get that right? And you question the American education system. (now I get why you have pronoun issues.)
you should have had someone explain the postings to you. I apologize for not dumbing them down to your level.
(no message)
(no message)
And that is saying a lot considering those two Clinton scumbags lived there.
(no message)
(no message)
You jackasses are no different than the foaming-at-the-mouth libs who hated Dubya. Both the Obamas and the Bushes are thoroughly decent people, which is probably why they get along so well.
Seriously, pull yourself together.
into an economic abyss. Not to mention all those American's killed and maimed because of the lie to invade Iraq.
But then, I'm probably wrong because I'm a foaming at the mouth Lib who lies about Bush and Cheney as opposed to LT who can't find a fact if it were stamped on his forehead.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
our allies. Add Saddam Hussein himself bragging about his WMD. Prove that they were not removed from the country before the invasion. In addition, you have to call John Kerry a liar also. During the 2004 debates, he agreed with the war, he only claimed that he would have conducted it better.
You have a lot of proving to do in order to correctly call GWB a liar.
But, of course you lack the intellectual quotient to comprehend that.
The Bushes are Saudi slaves.
(no message)
He promised too much... and now there is frustration that the country is not fundamentally transformed... and soon he will be gone. Making matters worse, African Americans are losing power everywhere to Latinos. Their prospects have not been this bad since the days before the Civil Rights Acts were enacted in the 1960's.
(no message)
(no message)
that is your modus operandi.
Put on your hammer and sickle dunce cap and sit in the corner like a good little commie.
And don't even think of trying to tie it to your military service you LYING hypocrite.
name calling and bogus info when you know nothing. I am entitled to medical care from the VA. I choose not to.
sector pension from the company that I spent my whole career with and regular Social Security.
(no message)
(no message)
Link: Illegals
(no message)
Especially in the last few nights.
I think in the minds of many, a riot is merely any protest that is predominantly black. Martin Luther King led a bunch of riots.
Malcolm X has won the day. "Do the right thing."
There are a lot of professionals shipped in to create chaos. Many of them were from out of state. Why doesn't Obama go after the chaos sewers like Soros who subsidize this behavior?
what Merriam Webster has to say. What has been occurring meets many of these definitions. I can believe the English dictionary for the real definition or your own made up BS. You lose.
Link: Riot
(no message)
(no message)
How does that work?
Or will you go with, "He didn't stop the riots!"
Here's the most important question: what are the things for which you will not blame the president when he is of the party you oppose? As near as I can tell, nothing. That's why we get ridiculous posts like this one.
BTW, was Ronnie responsible for riots in California during his watch? Or are leaders less responsible, the closer they are to the actual riots? I notice you assign no blame to McCrory in your post, for example. Interesting.
(no message)
every step of his presidency. He has divided at every opportunity rather than unified.
Importantly, he has also sent the signal that he will enforce punishment against the rioters and will hold authorities who try to stem the chaos with arrests. The same that he has done with immigration.
I put nothing past that devious Kenyan!
(no message)
Do you know any people so weak-minded that they develop hostility towards other races based upon what a president says? Who are these people? What specific comments have caused people to become more hostile?
Why don't you hold McCrory responsible for what happens in his state?
comments.
The words of the POTUS carry great weight. Especially the first AA president's words with AA's.
that his words caused blacks to become more hostile. For instance, ive me some quotes and then we can compare it to a timeline of this violence.
To be clear, I see many on the Left and Right exacerbating racial tensions for political gain.I haven't seen much of it from Obama. This accusation, unless I'm missing these glaring instances, is just yet another in a long line of shrill, hysterical accusations from the folks who oppose him on everything and blame him for everything. You'll notice when I asked your pal to give an instance of something for which he will not blame Obama, he had nothing. Hardly surprising. I fell about you guys the same I felt about the libs who blamed Dubya for everything. It's just partisan hackery.
BTW, if Dubs was on the ballot this year, I'd vote for him in a second. I'd even vote for Mitt.
Obama said that "that could have been my son", and went on to tell the story about how he was unfairly stopped as a "young black man". He stoked the flames in Florida, and violent protests followed - at least exacerbated by his justifying statements.
In Ferguson, he and Eric Holder made it clear from the start that the local police force was on warning. They were affraid to do anymore than back away while looters destroyed the city fo fear of being brought up on civil rights charges.
In both cases, he ignored that the perpetrator had been breaking the law.
This is key.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that rioters who know the police are shackled are more likely to act inapproriately.
As someone who was stalked by an adult as a teenager. And if I had been born black, I'm sure I would have had the same experience that he was relating. You could make that statement again and again and still conclude that what Martin did was a poor choice. That you or others choose to react as you have is on you, not him. That's personal responsibility rather than passing the buck and blaming someone else for whatever anger or hostility you have chosen to take on over the previous 7 years.
I share your disdain for the handling of the Ferguson situation. However, all through this thread, the accusations have been built around what Obama said. I'm unaware of any comments from him about Ferguson that were incendiary. If you now want to move the goalposts and blame his Cabinet or agency heads for their words, then did you also blame Reagan for what Ed Meese said or what James Watt said before they canned him?
Just more partisan hackery...
incite rioting.
That is very sad.
from the predictable sources, regurgitating these canned lines just as they count on you to recite them.
But prove me wrong, provide a shred of evidence that anything Obama has said dealing with race has caused people to become more hostile. Please, anything. You pasting a quote from him and then asserting that it did cause hostility isn't evidence. It's just another logical fallacy - argument by assertion.
make a video of folks proving what is obvious to most. It is also true that you have no evidence to disprove my assertions that agree with me. That is reflected in the poll.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/19/race-relations-reach-all-time-low-under-obama-poll/
Also read the link regarding the lawsuit regarding this issue.
Link: Lawsuit
Since I have to lead you by the hand, one way you might start trying to establish causality is to take one of those horrible, horrible, incendiary comments like, "He could have been my son," and find some evidence that right after those comments, polling revealed a sharp increase in hostilities. Instead, what you give me is this moronic logic: because race relations have deteriorated while Obama was president, it must be that Obama himself is responsible for this. Mind you, this is after you yourself stated that neither you nor anyone you know is affected by what presidents say on an issue like this. How exactly do you know that others, in contrast to you, are prey to political rhetoric on race but you are not? What is your evidence?
putative POTUS starts taking non racial incidents and blaming them on racism that folks listen.
His ongoing rhetoric is racist in itself.
There was more to it than "he could have been my son."
Again, you dispute my assertions, but your position is void of evidence.
The polling and lawsuit support my case. You have nothing except what you want it be like.
You have never lead me by the hand and never will. Just provide facts to support your case.
Beyond the Trayvon Martin statement that only the perpetually angry partisan hacks were offended by, you've posted absolutely no other examples. Not one. Nevermind demonstrating in any way that this alleged incendiary rhetoric has caused any conflict.
You're the one who made an assertion, scooter. An unsupported, emotionally-based assertion for which you have no evidence. I don't have to assert and thus support a thing to dismantle your emotionalism and piffle.
one to blow your theory out of the water. It is common sense.
His comments are well documented and I am not going to sit here and write a book to lead you by the hand. If you were up to speed, you would not question my position that agrees with the majority.
His remarks are a disgrace to the office, starting with the Beer at the WH created by his big mouth without being familiar with the issue. Come on down here and talk to the folks in Ferguson. Yes, I know cops that were on the ground and in danger because of your boy Soetoro.
Never mind the Holder decision, backed by Soetoro, not to bring indictments against the New Black Panthers who stood outside a polling place in PA. armed and threatening voters. The excuse was (paraphrased, but within a word or 2): I can't bring myself to bring charges against one of my own. Now, did he mean NBPs or Blacks period? In either case, they were not charged by making the promise that they would not do it again prior to the 2012 election. There they were again, same guys, on video. Please tell me that you don't see how this invites bad behavior including rioting? Please don't tell me that this was not a racist decision. The prosecutors spent months building an iron clad case, and were told no, those are my people.
Say something other than you are right and I am wrong.
Try you tube. Several commentaries regarding his rhetoric inciting anti-police violence and riots. Your sources must be very limited for you to question what is obvious to most folks.
McCrory making statements that incite racial tension.
You can't help yourselves. You'll avoid pertinent questions at all costs and dodge and divert.
You have no specifics. You have no evidence. You're one of these partisan fools who blames politicians from the opposite party for everything under the sun.
So, you aren't influenced by what a politician tells you to think nor are your friends, but all these millions over there, many of them blacks, they are indeed influenced by what politicians tell them to think? Tell me how a president causes people to be hostile to other races. Tell me specific Obama quotes and then show me the effect matched against a timeline of these riots.
As for McCrory, beyond the minor "black buffet" comment, nothing jumps out. Of course, if you're dumb enough to think that quotes are what drive racial tensions and not actions, you would probably discount the voter ID issue. Now, inanticipation of how your little mind works, I support voter ID. Enthusiastically. However, I favor it only when coupled with ID registration measures at the polls that would ensure that anyone who wants an ID would get one, quickly and painlessly. It also would include mandates of longer poll hours. Of course, the GOP opposes all that stuff. That's because the issue for them isn;t the same for me. I want elections of the highest integrity possible. They want to ensure their candidates keep getting elected. Those chances diminish the more black folks and the more poor minorities vote. Everybody knows that, including blacks. And when governors sign voter ID laws without including provisions like the ones I want, blacks understandably get furious, given the voting restrictions placed upon them in the past.
Some people around me wonder, I think if I'm a Republican and if not, why not. This issue is a prime example. Unfortunately, the Dems have purged just about all remaining conservative Dems from their ranks.
vote. Dems fight it because it restricts their massive voter fraud. You don't want folks getting IDs at the polls. You get them ahead of time. I don't buy the I can't get one because I am poor. The poor have them when it is time to get food stamps and welfare.
Where does it say in any voter ID law that only minorities need to have an ID?
They were offered free IDs in Georgia and still objected.
If you don't think that when Soetoro turns incidents into racial issues when they are not, thus inciting the riots, you need to think again.
You last sentence is very true, sadly.
Every time he hears the name Obama LT becomes more hostile. Not unlike many R's....
(no message)
or just more of the same Bullshit
(no message)
(no message)
When my wife and I were married, invitations went to members of every race on the planet. We have had guests in our home of every race on the planet. Our extended family includes members of every race on the planet.
You using the race card as an excuse for Soetoro's failures and extremism shows that you have no other defense.
I'll bet the gays at your wedding didn't dine at the same tables with the Arabs you invited.
The next time you defend "soetoro" for his being black and attack his policies, let me know in advance. I need a good laugh.
PS: I can't wait for your next post.
were close by. I do not defend or attack anyone due to their race. So, you are wasting your time if you expect to hear that from me. I criticize Soetoro due to his actions, no other reason.
GWB caused me to leave the GOP. The entire Bush family is whining like little kids because JEB got his ass whipped. I would never have voted for him. Does that mean that I hate Caucasian folks too?
You are still trying to build a phony case that says anyone who criticizes Soetoro and his policies is doing so due to his race. You are not the only one. Many Libs use the race card in a vain attempt to cover up for him because they have no other card to play.
You need a new line. The race card is worn out and never did work. All it does is prove that you cannot defend him on the issues.