(no message)
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/29/politics/anthony-fauci-fifth-amendment-plea
(no message)
Interestingly, the pardon goes back to 2014.
(no message)
Link: Why Was Dr. Fauci’s Pardon Backdated to 2014?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Mr. Fauci, is this Hunter's penis?
Fauci: I plead the 5th.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Science has declined to answer any questions to avoid incriminating itself for crimes it may have committed.
...
Link: https://babylonbee.com/news/science-pleads-the-5th

(no message)
"Always Wanted to Downplay It"...fortunately, Dr. Tony Fauci didn't play along, and for that courage he's being attacked by a Madman...who has your support.
(no message)
and "Honesty" aren't part of your lexicon.
He and Rand Paul got into a highly technical debate about what gain of function was. Fauci was trying to pull a "depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" argument to avoid criminality.
Why do YOU think Fauci was funding bioweapons level research with US tax dollars in frickin' China and not in the US?...and then went to great lengths to cover up the source (his funded lab) when it escaped the lab? The Congressional hearings are out there, and the diary indicates Fauci was lying to Paul. That is why Paul is pursuing this. Interesting that you would feign ignorance on this when you pretend expertise on everything else.
...by Fauci at the time. He knew he had provided funding to the lab. (Providing general funds to the lab certainly allows them to direct other funds to GOF.)
Fauci squelched the lab-leak theory when it was certainly as plausible. Leads to the question "Why?". Is it because he knew he had provided funds to the Wuhan lab. This should have been disclosed at the time. Why wasn't it?
Was it wise of Fauci to place trust in the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
AI Overview
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a lab leak, with some intelligence agencies suggesting it is likely; however the scientific consensus leans towards a natural origin through zoonotic transmission. The origins of COVID-19 remain under investigation, and BOTH theories are still considered plausible.
Investigations into the operations of The Wuhan Institute of Virology and the lab-leak theory have led to ongoing debates about its safety and transparency.
(no message)
(no message)
evolutionary development needed to match the genome of SARS-CoV-2...which is why the odds of Wuhan manufacturing the COVID-19 virus are so remote...
In addition, here is an AI Summary as to why it is highly unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 was manufactured in the Wuhan Lab...if you believe you have documentation that counters this, please provide it...otherwise, let's stop asserting that COVID-19 was manufactured in Wuhan, China...with Dr. Fauci's knowledge.
--------------------
AI Overview
It is unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 was manufactured because genetic analyses show no signs of human engineering, its genomic mutations match natural evolutionary patterns, and major scientific and intelligence assessments found no evidence it was created as a weapon or lab construct.
Genetic and Evolutionary Evidence
No artificial backbone:
The virus lacks the logical, targeted changes or standard synthetic backbones seen in lab-engineered constructs, instead displaying random, stepwise mutations characteristic of natural evolution.
Natural features: Key components like the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site match patterns of natural selection and recombination found in wild coronaviruses rather than laboratory manipulation.
Scientific and Intelligence ConsensusNo biological weapon:
The vast majority of the U.S. Intelligence Community and international scientific groups agree that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed or manufactured as a biological weapon.,
Pre-pandemic holdings:
Independent evaluations and intelligence reports indicate there was no record or indication that the Wuhan Institute of Virology possessed SARS-CoV-2 or a close direct progenitor in its database prior to the outbreak.
--------------------
Link: https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/coronavirus-bat-research
(no message)
(no message)
taxpayer money, and government power to exact revenge on an innocent man who dared to communicate the truth to the American public and help save their lives...instead of following DJT's lead and "Downplay" a deadly national health crisis .
(no message)
them...only to have the indictments drop for lack of any evidence. Trump is an extremely Vindictive man who uses our tax payments to fund personal vendettas. Are you OK with such behavior where they incur potentially huge legal fees defending themselves from baseless accusations?...
(no message)
I fully understand why he obsessively tried to coverup his complicity in the horror.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1AjU67W2s
...and our NIH/NIAID agencies conformed with Oversight restrictions...stop making stuff up.
The risks with a extremely dangerous pathogen are more than obvious.
Fauci gambled... and we all lost.
Then he denied responsibility.
The cover up was far worse than the crime.
mostly fomented by the dipshit in the oval office.
Unbelievable. Read yesterday's editorial on your hero. The Journal is conservative, but fair in this editorial.
you have your sycophantasies and baseless, infantile ad hominems.
who ya got?
patiently awaiting your next dung heap of name calling.
(no message)
Consent Management