Wolensky, too. "The best of us," my ass.

Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-discussed-covid-mrna-vaccine-concerns-pregnant-women-text-chain-released-senate-committee

1) It is clear that Fauci knew about the potential risk of miscarriages in the early pregnancy due to fever from cytokine rxn - particularly in patients getting their 2nd shot of the vaccine - he even stated it as a risk.
-no mention of this ever went public in recommendations.
It is clear that Fauci and other governing medical body heads in the US chose to not follow the WHO guideline release that expressed caution in this pregnancy scenario.
They made the choice for patients that the risk of not getting the vaccine on board fully outweighed the risk of miscarriage, and in order to do what they wanted, they never told the public nor the doctors treating them.
That is immoral and wrong, but worse is this:

2) What is most concerning is that there was a significant study which ended upsupporting the concern about increased miscarriage rate in those PG patients who received the vaccine in the first trimester, and yet the governing medical bodies remained completely in tow to Fauci and Walensky (including my ACOG). They had certainly seen the career destroying results of opposing Fauci from other reputable scientists that tried to speak against his narrative (Bhattacharya in particular).

Let me explain the concern being expressed by congress at present:
A study in the NEJM 2021 had the data that clearly showed an increased risk of miscarriage (referred to as spontaneous abortion). The study when initially published, erroneously misinterpreted the data, but a follow up letter to the editor brought the fact to light.
The NEJM and every reviewer of the journal for publication is well versed in statistics. Yet this study inexplicably made the most rudimentary statistical error that could possible be made:
In calculating the miscarriage rate, they used the #miscarriages/total number of pregnancy pts vaccinated (104/827 cases).........instead of #miscarriages/ pregnant pts getting vaccine in early pregnancy ( (where the risk of the fever causing miscarriage is at significant potential risk from the vaccine).
Thus, the study published claimed a much lower miscarriage rate than was actually the case for those at risk from the vaccine fever....the rate they claimed with this faulty interpretation of data that even a high school student wouldn't make conveniently came out around 12% which was similar to normal miscarriage rate in the gen population.
But when you look at the miscarriage rate in pregnant patients who received the vaccine in early pregnancy, the miscarriage rate is MUCH higher since (104/127) rate was much higher. The miscarriages all happened in early pregnancy (as miscarriages do), but the study quoted for support of Fauci's recommendations diluted the miscarriages among ALL pregnant patients who received the vaccine in later pregnancy as well which diluted the miscarriage rate finding.

While Fauci, NEJM, ACOG et al might otherwise claim unintentional error on this (incredible error), the problem is that this sharp doctor noticed and published a letter to the editor which MUST come to the attention of the NEJM and then , of course ACOG and NIH. The fact the the letter was published meant that the NEJM reviewers felt it was a legitimate point.
I linked this. The original article is available through a link within my link.

Honestly, I want to read through this article really carefully and also find out exactly what the texts on Fauci's phone said.
My hesitation comes partly from the new higher miscarriage rate of 104/127 cases of early pregnancies who received the Vax experiencing miscarriage. This number is not plausible to me (it appears too high as this level of miscarriage rate would have very likely bene apparent to all of us clinically) which would call into question the validity of the study. At the same time, the rate is clearly higher than the general population, and there is enough power to this study to warrant AT LEAST caution until more studies are done.

The other part of my hesitation comes from how deeply this implicates many others in govt medical leadership who went along with this.
I will look at this, and i will gladly retract anything that proves exculpatory. But I wanted to explain in simple terms what is known and what is being alleged from these texts (the information listed in paragraph after #2)

Regardless, even if only the known facts (I numbered them as #1) are considered, Fauci et all did a horrendous disservice to the people of this country and the world in not telling them so that they could make their own informed decision. I feel that it is a form of assault, and many state courts may well agree with me regardless of pardon status.


Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113516#core-sa1r1-1

(no message)

It might be time to start pursuing them.

If you can’t believe an opinion piece from the Atlantic, what can you believe?

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

(no message)

Link: https://www.tmz.com/2026/08/09/ben-jones-dead/

(no message)

Link: https://www.tmz.com/2026/08/09/ben-jones-dead/