(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
My answer is obviously yes. But Kamala would have been far worse in other ways. And one of those ways is lying and gaslighting.
The only reason she is in the conversation is because of a Biden DEI decision to choose a black female running mate.
She is a such a horrendous candidate that the '24 Dem campaign managers tried to literally avoid TV interviews and appearances in hopes that she could maybe just "survive" her way in to office in the short months following Biden's dropping out in the summer until the Nov election. Even in this, she failed. They could not hide her stupidity which came shining through with each word salad she delivered even in the most planned and controlled setting that they could provide. She didn't even provide a geographical benefit as she came from CA which the Dems were already assured of winning.
It leaves us with two clear take aways:
1) DEI results in disaster because it uses criteria unrelated to competence.
2) The Dems clearly don't respect kamala enough to allow her to be their candidate, and if they don't, why should the country as a whole?
By the way, it is a near certainty that if Harris were the president instead of Trump, we would be dealing with a nuclear Iran at this time and thus probably a much mor horrid situation in the Middle East than the mini-conflict we are dealing with at present.
Link: https://nypost.com/2026/04/29/us-news/top-democrats-refuse-to-back-kamala-harris-for-president-in-2028/
toughness...to name just a few qualities...than Donald Trump..who's complete dissection is yet to be revealed. This country needs to shed its Misogyny...when we pick a Convicted Felon, Rapist, Fraud, Insurrectionist with a monumental Personality Disorder, over an accomplished AG with no malfeasance, much less criminal record, for our #1 state, in population and GDP...in large measure because the candidate is Female...we hurt the nation.
Consent Management