Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

Hysterical. All you do is have to wait 5 mins & the reporting gets shot to bits. Chris, feel stupid?

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 2:22 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1083070872754274305

Replies to: Hysterical. All you do is have to wait 5 mins & the reporting gets shot to bits. Chris, feel stupid?


Thread Level: 2

You don’t have to feel it. You are it.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:00 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

He’s passing internal campaign polling data to a GRU operative to give to Russian oligarchs. Collusion 101. Give me any possible innocent reason.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 3

You’ll note that he backed away from his original claim pretty fast

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 6:06 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Changed the subject. Because his post was even stupider than normal.

Thread Level: 3

You didn't read the NYTimes reporting. You have your facts wrong.

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 4:28 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

What facts might they be genius?

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:39 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 5

1. Polling, not voter data. 2. Shared to please Manafort's Ukrainian friends, not Putin. But Orange

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 6:20 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Man Bad!

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 6

you refuse to learn

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:18 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

1) the polling data IS voter data

2) the Ukrainians ARE Putin’s guys

Looking forward to explaining it again tomorrow!


Thread Level: 7

You are wrong so often that you should be banned.

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 7:38 am on Jan 10, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1083332728194510848?s=19

Thread Level: 6

I said internal polling data genius. Passed to a GRU operative.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 8:14 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

His excuse for doing it is irrelevant. Collusion 101.

Now answer the question.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 7

You should be embarassed.

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 8:26 am on Jan 10, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/1083336052545409030

Thread Level: 8

Uhm how? Like these two weren’t Putin allies? Like he didn’t give internal campaign data to a GRU

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 11:15 am on Jan 10, 2019
View Single

operative?

Like, he hasn’t been known to lie before.

Like he didn’t offer to brief Oleg before.

You should be embarrassed to have supported such a traitorius campaign.


Thread Level: 4

Cole not answering an inconvenient question? Shocking!

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:32 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Just one clown post after another.

Thread Level: 5

He’s the worst type of enabler/apologist, but fun to mess with.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:46 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

You voted for a rapist's enabler.

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 6:18 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Thread Level: 7

Against an actual rapist, yeah.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 8:15 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 8

If he was convicted, then he must have already paid his debt to society. Otherwise, he'd be in jail.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 9:06 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 9

You mean the one who was enabled?

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 9:32 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

You know why con men rarely get caught?

Author: Rooney (5917 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:55 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Because their marks, who think they are smart people, are too embarrassed to admit they got conned as it would reveal that they aren't nearly as smart as they think they are.

I think that description fits a few posters here. Some people have said that describes Cole. I won't say it. But some people are saying it. As you know.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

"I didn't come here to take part. I came here to take over."
Thread Level: 7

Amen.

Author: ND1IRISH (3269 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:41 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Hard as this is to believe, you do not understand what this means.

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:32 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Kilimnik is the GRU officer. Manafort can ask him to pass on the GOP voter info to anyone he wants....it is giving it to a Russian intelligence officer in the first place that is the issue.

Look, maybe this is nothing.

But if it is true, then it proves collusion, and is unforgivable.


Thread Level: 3

It might be something. It might not. More fun to think it might be something, though, am I right?

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 2:41 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 4

Mueller apparently thinks it is something

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:45 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

And he knows more than we do.

Thread Level: 5

He thinks it is something that was lied about, not that the something was a crime.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 4:26 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

Am I wrong? I'm willing to be educated. I just didn't see anything which indicated it was criminal. I saw statements that were ambiguous enough to support impeachment if the underlying facts go one way, and anmbiguous enough to includes sets of facts going the other way which would not support impeachment.

I am not arguing that Trump is innocent on this. I'm only commenting on what we know that Mueller knows.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 6

As I keep saying we don’t know what he has or what he thinks.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:44 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

We do know that he has everything he wants from NSA.

I will ask you the same question I put to Colebot. Give me an innocent explanation for the campaign manager of a major party nominee giving a GRU operative campaign polling data to give to Russian oligarchs?


Thread Level: 7

That's what I've been saying. We don't know. You sure do act like you know, though.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 6:40 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

What was the data? Was it confidential? Was it publicly available? When was it given?...during the campaign?...before he was campaign manager? To whom was it given? To his business partner? Was the guy tied to current Russian intelligence organizations? If so, did he know that? Or, was the recipient just a soviet military intelligence veteran, like so many veterans in the US who have nothing to do with the intelligence community here now? Did he give it with instructions? Or was it just on the server at their company, and thereby accessible to the Ukrainian guy? Do we count Ukrainians as Russians all the time, or just in this case? Was the information for a special purpose for them to exploit? Or, was it incidental to a conversation, and mentioned in passing? Was it the same kind of information that the Dems gave foreign operatives? I think there are a lot of facts which could lean illegal, or which could lean to legal. We'll just have to see.

This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 8

Really? None of that matters.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 8:17 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

What we know right now damns that campaign.

Give me an innocent explanation for the campaign manager of a major party prez nominee providing internal campaign information to a GRU operative. I really want to hear it.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Thread Level: 9

I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 9:10 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

First a few questions: What internal campaign information was provided?

Was the guy a GRU operative when he gave it? What was his name? Are you talking about his business partner?

What law was violated?

Make your case.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 10

Then give me an innocent explanation for what they did. C’mon boy you can do it.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 9:35 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

You have yet to supply it especially for a prez nominee campaign manager to give internal campaign information to a GRU operative.

Thread Level: 11

No law has been alleged to be violated. That's a good explanation most of the time.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 10:40 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 12

Which means you can’t. Figures.

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 8:24 am on Jan 10, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

And how exactly do you know that?

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:29 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

As always, we don't know what Mueller knows, or what he is thinking, or what he is planning.

EDIT: I forgot - Baron and Cole know. No collusion!


Thread Level: 7

You call me out in this thread where you were just pantsed for your comments yesterday?

Author: BaronVonZemo (59926 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 5:59 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

I'll give you this, you have chutzpah.

Thread Level: 8

Uh, what now?

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 6:04 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 7

Just reading portions of what you posted.

Author: NedoftheHill (44672 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 4:33 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 3

Again, worthless "polling" data, not "voter" data, which is the mistake you keep making

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 2:36 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

because all you do is want to smear Trump.

Read the tweet yourself.


Thread Level: 4

This is like watching Clemson on Alabama in the 4th Q. Let's see if Chris gives up like Bama did.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59926 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:00 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

Worthless? Bwahahahaha

Author: Frank L (64681 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:02 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

Those are the words Manafort's lawyers used

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:44 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

No way they would try to paint it in the best light possible.

You're a clown.


Thread Level: 5

They used the word "polling." Please provide a link where they used "voter."

Author: Cole (16187 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 2:47 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

I am ready to be proven wrong on this, but this is from Vox and The Hill:

Manafort's attorneys appeared to acknowledge that the contacts occurred, writing that their client was unable to recall "specific details" about them before having his "recollection refreshed" by the special counsel.

"The same is true with regard to the Government’s allegation that Mr. Manafort lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign," they wrote.


Link: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/8/18174094/manafort-filing-mueller

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 6

Miscommunication - I meant "polling" was the word his attorneys used

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:55 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View Single

I also meant that you generally poll voters. Otherwise there is no point in polling.

Maybe the GRU was merely interested in Trump's internal polling numbers. You know, whether the GOP's in-house pollsters had him ahead or not.

But since that makes no goddam sense (why would they want that?) - and since Mueller would not care one bit about that - it is not likely the only data they wanted.

See?


Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS