Do you who are Orange supporters here feel that he should be impeached if it is proven beyond
reasonable doubt that he suborned Cohen to commit perjury about his connections to the Russians?
Replies to: Do you who are Orange supporters here feel that he should be impeached if it is proven beyond
Yes
If proven, rail him.
I think it depends on what the connections are if indeed there are connections? Trying to get close
to the enemy in order to promulgate good things for the country, in my mind does not constitute a bad connection.
Suborning perjury has nothing to do with "connections"
(no message)
Said many times, just impeach him, paper tiger. A liar suddenly becomes your treasure, pathetic.
(no message)
Yes but allegations of a known liar does not constitute proof
(no message)
Of course. But according to the report there is a good deal of other evidence.
(no message)
Except if he lied for Trump at the direction of Trump.
(no message)
.
(no message)
This is now beyond opinion
If this is true, and Mueller has supporting evidence - Cohen taped a lot of conversations, remember - he will certainly be impeached. It will go to the Senate...where the country will be torn apart.
The most important person in the country will be Mitch McConnell.
Buzzfeed already debunked its own story. Why do you persist in the face of its debunking?
(no message)
No they didn't. Wishful thinking.
(no message)
1. An admitted fabulist reporter 2. does not quote from his sources 3. did not see the documents
4. does not identify his sources and 5. his sources do not quote the documents they allegedly read.
Debunked.
Hopefully, your premature ejaculation is limited to your writings.
(no message)
There is only one possible Trump defense for this
It is a false report! There is no other possible response, because if it is true, it is the end of the line.
You don't know, and I don't know. But these reporters have staked their careers on it.
We will know soon.
No they didn’t. They said they hadn’t seen the supporting evidence.
They also said they had two sources who confirmed it.
Answer the question, if you can?
Why would credible sources go to non-credible BuzzFeed[News] over NYT, WAPO, etc?
(no message)
I believe this was the result of investigative reporting, not a leak
According to the journalists involved, it has been in the works for almost a year.
We shall see.
Pretty easy solution to all of this, wait to see if it is corroborated or disproven.
Cole just can’t help himself though.
Also interesting that both Orange and Gooey Guliani are attacking Cohen as a liar, not the fact that the tabloid got the story wrong.
Agreed.
(no message)
In the meantime, you seem happy to assume it's true.
Wrong. Pointing out the fact that he’s an admitted liar also isn’t dispositive
when the lie was clearly to protect someone else. If not the case, how could one ever come clean about lying for someone else?
That lie about when the tower deal ceased benefited him how? It benefited only one person.
God, you are dumb.
One of them is a fabulist who reported the Karl Rove got indicted. And, both said they saw nothing.
They are relying on the hearsay of someone who says he saw something and off the Left goes! - foaming at the mouth, because ORANGE MAN BAD!
All sane Americans hope this is not an accurate story
If it is, then it means really bad news for the country. Real bad.
You are smart, I give you that. Don't vouch for the story, but talk about it a lot
so it leaves a mark. Smart.
Again, merely wishful thinking
(no message)
The Columbia Journalism Review used more polite words in describing the reporter's history of lying.
He is a liar.
Of course they are. And you believe Trumpo about the prayer rugs found at border
don’t you?
You will do and say anything to support Little Donny Douche’bag, won’t you?
The Columbia Journalism Review has documented that Leopold has been “caught making stuff up” on more
than one occasion and “had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns over the accuracy of quotations.”
This is the guy who you have worked yourself up in a tizzy over.
Who is Leopold?
(no message)
Loeb’s Buddy.
(no message)
Found it. Thanks.
PS: very funny though - At first that was what I thought he meant.