(no message)
Link: https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/429623-americans-continue-their-march-to-low-tax-states
Or do you think northeastern liberals suddenly turn into bible-thumping redneck Trump-bots just because they move to the south?
(no message)
to go.
Solved.
Not go delete your account for not believing in the power of AOC.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
At least the danger of the youg socialist/communists in your party is real. The best response you've got is that "they are young and need to be brought along". In 10 years, they will be old vets, and they will still be socialist/communists with far more power and savvy. They are a true danger. The Russian collusion myth isn't even real.
You guys are so screwed.
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-special-envoy-for-venezuela-clashes-with-rep-omar
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
That guy is Laffer's co-author, so apply many grains of salt to all his "analysis."
(no message)
(no message)
attractive states will need walls.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
the taxes which generally means they are pro keeping your money which means they are pro Republican.
How many are moving to retire to lower cost-of-living areas?
How many are working-age people looking to get to a place with a more reasonable cost of living?
The indication is that not many are moving from California. More are moving from NY, but how many are seeking a better climate? MI, OH, PA, WV also lost people.
(no message)
Looks like a mixed bag of red states and blue states losing. I'm not sure whether PA, WV, MI, OH, or AL are all "red states", but they certainly went for Trump.
The states that gained are either warm weather states, or blue states.
This is why you need to post facts with your ill-conceived analysis.
What don’t you understand. NY continues to lose to those two Red states while CA may stay steady state. It’s due to high taxes as the story suggests. You won’t admit when you’re wrong. People vote with their feet.
You didn't mention NY/CA vs. FL/TX in your original post. I still do not think you have. Also, follow the subthread up from here, you'll see that you never mention NY, CA, FL or TX
Now, you did bring them up in another subthread. I responded specifically to that issue in that subthread. I took time to develop thoughts, supported by evidence, from which we might further discuss NY/CA vs. FL/TX, and how taxes may or may not be affecting their population.
Instead of responding, you decide to pretend I never posted anything on subject. You are a dishonest person. But I don't blame you because you were raised that way.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=514994
Where?
(no message)
(no message)
Since the those states were so damn attractive. Right?
People have been paying high taxes in NY and CA for years. They remain among the most populous states. There has been some shifting but by and large, the overall numbers do not lie. If those states weren't awesome, nobody would live there and pay the taxes. Yet millions do. So let's look at the actual data and see what it tells us.
The red state gainers are warm weather states. NY will lose only two, and is a cold-weather state.
CA is lose one or no change. That is less than Ohio, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Michigan and West Virginia - are those high tax states as well?
Also - the cost of living in CA and NY is outrageous. Not so much in other states that lost a seat (OH, PA, AL, MI, WV). Again, because people want to be there, despite the taxes. That is why the cost of living (housing etc.) is so high in CA and NY.
According to Election Data Services, the following states are poised to gain seats:
Texas will gain three, from 36 to 39;
Florida will gain two, from 27 to 29;
Arizona will gain one, from nine to 10;
Colorado will gain one, from seven to eight;
Montana will gain one, from at-large to two;
North Carolina will gain one, from 13 to 14; and
Oregon will gain one, from five to six.
These states are poised to lose seats:
New York will lose two, from 27 to 25;
Alabama will lose one, from seven to six;
California will lose one or remain even, from 53 to 52 or no change;
Michigan will lose one, from 14 to 13;
Minnesota will lose one or remain even, from eight to seven or no change;
Ohio will lose one, from 16 to 15;
Pennsylvania will lose one, from 18 to 17;
Rhode Island will lose one, from two to one; and
West Virginia will lose one, from three to two.
Reconsider their socialist ways which is always a good thing.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
No one though it could happen. The villages in central Florida loaded with retirees gave Trump over 70% of the vote easily overcoming the liberal cities. Like Philly versus rural PA.
A big part of it. Still, many retirees migrated there from lib localities.
Both had evolved in RINO’s and hated Trump.
(no message)
(no message)