(no message)
I am willing to accept the IG findings as I am willing to accept the Durham findings.
If the two conflict with each other, I will believe the party with subpoena power and the power to convict which is Durham.
The IG report is small in scope compared to the Durham investigation, and it is fundamentally different in it’s approach. But Horowitz’s report is only the appetizer, and GOP and Dems will have to wait longer for the real meat.
(no message)
Did it ever occur to you that Barr may have good reasons to question the IG's purported finding of no political bias?
Even before Durham he had a fixed view on what happened. He’s a hack and a disgrace.
I’ll take the independent guy.
When is the MCCabe indictment by the way?
Meanwhile, you said "Orange Jr." would be indicted before December 25, 2018. Putting the date aside, do you still stand by that statement?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
memory.
(no message)
So they want to impeach him which will only assure his re-election. How stupid can that party be?
Both Barry and Orange had the prerogative to appoint political hacks.
Just don’t claim they have credibility as idjits like Cole claim.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
This is new: Inpeachment report shows multiple phone calls between @DevinNunes and Rudy’s now indicted former partner Lev Parnas pic.twitter.com/9Cc0gQfhkj
— Jim Sciutto (@jimsciutto) December 3, 2019
(no message)
Barr though isn’t supposed to be a partisan politician as AG. See if you can wrap your pea sized brain around that concept.
Even Romney wouldn't go there.
(no message)
He has never offered the evidence he claimed existed. A page from Harry Reid's book.