(no message)
The IG was neutral and well respected. Durham is not.
That’s why.
No different from Mueller (except that his behavior suggests that his rep is actually legitimate).
We were supposed to accept Mueller’s word, but now you don’t in return accept Durham’s word.
Well, unlike Democrats, Durham will supply evidence and will bring indictments where people will get to defend themselves in the normal way. The truth will be exposed both ways. And he won’t be branching into any and all other areas to bring down your people.
Durham is the only aspect of the DOJ that carries any credibility anymore. Unsurprisingly, you claim that he isn’t well respected out of the blue. You ignored our complaints about Weisman’s history. You ignored our complaints about Mueller’s team being all hyper Dems. You ignored our complaints of Mueller’s multiple politically timed leaks. Durham did none of that, yet his is the rep you question?! Of course.
But I am uninterested in his "judgment" of the IG report, which he gave already for some reason.
..like with Trump and Kavanaugh for instance.
Hannity will love it. The president will tweet about it hundreds of times.
Everyone else will ignore it.
Now I know that you speak with no more expertise than what CNN tells you.
He has a history of prosecuting members of the government regardless of political persuasion.
I assume the reason he is now a flunky to you is that he has Comey and Brennan in his sights.
Another pompous asshat who wants to tell the current admin how to do their jobs while he was a gigantic scumbag who hid behind BHO. I really hope Durham drops the hammer on them.
will come to light.
