Tell you what Chris. Let's just wait for Durham's findings before either of us make judments on IC
(no message)
Replies to: Tell you what Chris. Let's just wait for Durham's findings before either of us make judments on IC
Better yet... let's admit that both sides are playing hardball politics instead of doing their jobs!
(no message)
.
(no message)
You mean the report from Trump’s lawyer? Why not just ask Rudy what he thinks?
The IG was neutral and well respected. Durham is not.
That’s why.
Hypocrisy. You fail The Other Shoe Test yet again. He’s a lifetime professional with great rep
No different from Mueller (except that his behavior suggests that his rep is actually legitimate).
We were supposed to accept Mueller’s word, but now you don’t in return accept Durham’s word.
Well, unlike Democrats, Durham will supply evidence and will bring indictments where people will get to defend themselves in the normal way. The truth will be exposed both ways. And he won’t be branching into any and all other areas to bring down your people.
Durham is the only aspect of the DOJ that carries any credibility anymore. Unsurprisingly, you claim that he isn’t well respected out of the blue. You ignored our complaints about Weisman’s history. You ignored our complaints about Mueller’s team being all hyper Dems. You ignored our complaints of Mueller’s multiple politically timed leaks. Durham did none of that, yet his is the rep you question?! Of course.
Look, if he finds actual evidence of actual malfeasance, then I will listen
But I am uninterested in his "judgment" of the IG report, which he gave already for some reason.
I am in full agreement and again wish that you always respected the need for evidence
..like with Trump and Kavanaugh for instance.
What evidence do you have that Durham is not neutral and well respected?
(no message)
He is Burr’s hand-picked flunky. You will see - his report will make no difference.
Hannity will love it. The president will tweet about it hundreds of times.
Everyone else will ignore it.
And you give no specifics for your false claim other than Barr appointed him.
Now I know that you speak with no more expertise than what CNN tells you.
Great. Now Frank is going to latch on to you & post about "Burr" every time you post in the future.
(no message)
He was also Eric Holder's "hand-picked flunky" at one time too (CIA interrogation techniques).
He has a history of prosecuting members of the government regardless of political persuasion.
I assume the reason he is now a flunky to you is that he has Comey and Brennan in his sights.
Chris has done a 180 from his Mueller claims. Sad and disappointing.
(no message)
Any mention of Eric Holder is hard to swallow.
Another pompous asshat who wants to tell the current admin how to do their jobs while he was a gigantic scumbag who hid behind BHO. I really hope Durham drops the hammer on them.
We already see libs hypocritical rationalization. But indictments will still require a trial &truth
will come to light.
Holder=Fast and Furious
(no message)