1/6 legitimate political discourse: Republican Party
Reaching then pushing the boundaries and limits of absurdity as always.
Replies to: 1/6 legitimate political discourse: Republican Party
Liz explained her actions on Honestly with Bari Weis - very clearly TDS - I’m sure you relate
(no message)
As with any cult, there are different levels of indoctrination Biden deadender Basil
(no message)
Any registered Republican with an ounce of integrity should denounce the RNC by leaving the party.
Unbelievable that the RNC has normalized the JAN 6th insurrection as "good ol' politics."
It is particularly stupid, given the mounting evidence from the JAN 6th committee.
Meanwhile, Pelosi begs our athletes to not show any integrity, and to stay quiet, because, China.
(no message)
Hmm...let's see here...seizing voting machines on one hand....keeping quiet in China on the other...
really, really hard choices for Ned...Un...be...lievable.
Such is the state of the GOP and conservatism today...
Ty with the garden variety pseudo Marxist propaganda
(no message)
She's got business interests she doesn't want fucked up by some sport entertainers
(no message)
Meanwhile, the Biden Administration quietly withdrew Whoopi from consideration for the Supreme Court
(no message)
Someone showed him a picture of Candace Owens and he made her the new nominee.
(no message)
What Cole said 💯%🥇
(no message)
(no message)
What about all the Democrat encouraged summer rioting of 2020?
(no message)
A career criminal died on a street because he couldn't control his drug habit. He was then transfor
A career criminal died on a street because he couldn't control his drug habit. He was then transformed into a saint and martyr
It’s not that, that is a really asinine statement, it’s just that it is thoughtless
and largely an unforgivable summary of Americans protesting the almost sanctioned killings of our black brothers and sisters by police officers (mostly white officers) who gave their oath to protect all American citizens.
How about you regroup and note the fire storm created by the last president, the man who was organizing a coup and insurrection through the misuse of our government and inspiring the gullible deplorable’s to attack those in the Capitol building to change the election results to install trump, breaking our democracy.
There is nothing similar in these two events no matter how hard you and your brethren here say they are. Your equivalence meter is broken.
Research better Jim. More whites are killed by police than blacks. Some years
it’s almost double.
That’s some kinda’ justification. Also, you’ve clearly missed the point.
Ps- too many things to add - however, where are the videos of white men being killed by police unjustly? We do have many videos of black men being killed for minor infractions having their lives terminated unjustly.
But this is now about your false equivalency. You see white people attack our government and immediately point out black people protest too. Sincerely brain dead justification.
No political value so no need for CNN to run them on a loop.
(no message)
That's undoubtedly the best bit of drama you have written, or maybe
in your case probably plagiarized
They were riots that killed, burned down homes and businesses for a piece of shit named George Floyd
(no message)
Shhh we can’t talk about that. BLM riots were ok because democrats supported
them.
One more: Cheney's response
McCarthy on Fox: "I think those two individuals would have a hard time ever coming back to Congress"
The big-tent GOP. Toe the line or get out.
Not a cult.
Keep listening to them. Eventually you will comprehend the other five sixths.
(no message)
Seems like a ridiculous own goal by the RNC.
While I disagree that 1/6 was a coup attempt or insurrection, it was certainly not "legitimate political discourse". Depressing.
Maybe they should have just said it was mostly peaceful.
Actually didn't know there was a formal announcement from the RNC. I just figured that Jim was having a moment.
They should just rename it. It's the Trump Party.
Deviance from the Trump Party line will obviously not be tolerated.
I'm sure the Trump Party people on here are proud.
With 71% of the American voting public preferring that Trump NOT run in 2024...and that's before his
trials get rolling...I'm having a hard time envisioning him as the "Owner" of anything...additionally, key GOP donors (e.g. Ken Griffin) are vehemently against him...so, combine all that with DT's other feuds (e.g. McConnell, DeSantis, etc.) and he's back in familiar territory...i.e. "owning" a bankrupt enterprise...
Much can change before 2024, but nothing regarding Trump will change for the better, so the GOP needs to get started in earnest to line up alternate candidates who will appeal to big donors...and to conservative voters.
Link: https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2022/01/27/supreme-court-poll-wave-6-national-issues-press-release/
Ken Griffin is financing an Illinois R for governor who supports BLM and voted for Biden.
71% of your friends? 71% of the R DC elite? 71% of Neil Young entourage? 71% of Liz Cheney's relatives? The fact that you are getting no sleep thinking of the midterms and the general is what keeps this open board energized every day.
Here's the source for the "71%" comment...happy reading, ELP...
just for giggles...how do you see Donald Trump resurrecting himself and becoming the 2024 GOP nominee?...please don't forget to include an assessment of how he avoids a 'Sedition' charge for his Jan. 6th insurrection strategy that included having the military, or the DOJ, or Homeland Security seize voting machines...btw, such a conviction would ban him from public office...and there are just short of three years yet to go...now that I think of it, that 71% figure could get a whole lot larger...would you put your life savings behind such a candidate?
Oh, and here's a bio on Ken Griffin...he likes to donate to Republicans...and DJT isn't one of them...I'm betting it'll be anyone else in 2024.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_C._Griffin
Link: https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2022/01/27/supreme-court-poll-wave-6-national-issues-press-release/
You lost. You can't wish things to happen. Spend hrs researching to find what you want.
Your first mistake was invoking the name of Ken Griffin. You saw anti-Trump "R" and that turned you on. The fact that this rich political genius has thrown his money and support for an Illinois R candidate for governor (Richard Irvin) is all you needed. Richard Irvin is a part time R and a full time BLM lefty who voted for Biden. Griffin's candidate bombed so badly the other day under scrutiny from the media that he ended the interview and left. LOL. That's Griffin's candidate. That's who you are parading around as a source. You are brilliant. The more you speak, the better it is for the conservative side.
I can't help but notice that you have nothing to say about the key issue...71% of voters don't want
Trump to run in 2024...that's a BIG DEAL...Mr. Griffin is just one Republican donor, albeit a very rich one, who won't be helping to fund any Trump campaign, nor perhaps any other who swears allegiance to him...
So, what have you to say about the "71%"?....that's more than a 2:1 ratio...and it was him running against Biden, or all people....no one wins with that kind of polling...and what Party would want to be "Owned" by such a "candidate"?
Your argument is an MSNBC talking point. It's camel phlegm. It's not worth the effort.
The more you dig in, the more embarrassing it gets for you. You don't know what you're talking about. You lost. You have no numbers. You have no argument. Just let it ride. You've learned a painful lesson. This open forum is not your knitting circle.
Trump Party. I like the sound of that. Anything to piss you rumps off.
(no message)
Are you really pointing this finger after how you guys treated Manchin and Sinnema?
(no message)
Are you serious, Clark? You're whatabouting this too?
Try to respond for once rather than deflect with horse shit.
There were no censures of either you mentioned. Just try not to whatabout. Just once.
The committe is so clearly corrupt and predetermined that I have no care for Liz Cheney.
(no message)
Clearly - if you’re a member of the cult.
(no message)
Your side seems to beg for it by constantly doing things you say you dislike.
But, I can understand why you would like to ban the use of whataboutism, since it exposes the Left on virtually every issue.
Ah, the whatabout king, rising to defend his way of defending the indefensible
So fucking sick of it.
Pretty embarrassing for you, but you do it to yourself.
What's really funny is that you seem to call non-whataboutism whataboutism all the time. Would be easier if you just admit you don't have a counter-argument.
The person who makes the argument does not also have to make a counterargument
Noting the hypocrisy of the other side is the easiest, laziest and most pointless tactic in political debate. It does nothing to advance any argument.
"Pay no attention to the hypocrisy!" says the hypocrite.
(no message)
TDS
(no message)
Hilarious pearl clutching. Take yourself to your fainting couch.
(no message)
Do you wear your shoes on the opposite foot every day or
only when you post here?