Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
4
Downvote this post.

Inaccurate Virus Models Are Panicking Officials Into Ill-Advised Lockdowns

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:44 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://thefederalist.com/2020/03/25/inaccurate-virus-models-are-panicking-officials-into-ill-advised-lockdowns/

Replies to: Inaccurate Virus Models Are Panicking Officials Into Ill-Advised Lockdowns


Thread Level: 2

“Madeline Osburn is a staff editor at the Federalist and the producer of The Federalist Radio Hour”

Author: Chris94 (36755 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:15 pm on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

I think we can trust her advice.

Thread Level: 3

Not interested in the views of mouthpieces on either side. Just want to hear it from the Docs and

Author: Frank L (64677 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 1:28 pm on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

Epidemiologists in lay terms that make sense.

Then, make the hard choices.


Thread Level: 2

Believe it or not, data scientists, engineers, epidemiologists, and public health officials

Author: ND_in_DRO (3958 Posts - Joined: Nov 1, 2016)

Posted at 11:02 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

are not "Democratic activists". The models aren't perfect, but are working with the best data available. Have you been paying attention to what is happening in Italy?

Thread Level: 3

I stopped reading at the phrase “Wuhan Virus”. Obviously a political piece.

Author: Frank L (64677 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 11:51 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

The Imperial College model is not peer-reviewed.

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:03 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

You have peer-reviewed data that contradicts it?

Author: ND_in_DRO (3958 Posts - Joined: Nov 1, 2016)

Posted at 11:22 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 5

This is NOT contest. But I won't make policy decision based on un-peer-reviewed, unverified model.

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:28 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

This pandemic won't wait for a peer-review Eli

Author: ND_in_DRO (3958 Posts - Joined: Nov 1, 2016)

Posted at 11:47 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

Decisions need to be made fast based on the best data available. By the way, what's your thoughts on using anti-malaria drugs as recommended by Trump? (and which also aren't peer-reviewed as of yet).

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 7

Fine. 1. Just don't call your decision scientific. 2. We already had a decision -business as usual

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:24 pm on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

It's called based on null hypothesis. Well, accurately say majority of business as usual, more accurately say at least 80% business should remain as usual. The data from Diamond Princess already told us 80% of her 3,500 people are immune to covid-19, 20% got infected (but 80% of the infected are either have mild symptom or no mild symptom). The rough picture is clear to me, detailed and accurate picture is still not clear though.

BTW, Drug testing is a clinical trial thing (e.g. double blind), it is not a modeling thing


Thread Level: 2

Easily countered with a few Donald lies. "We're doing so great". "We're in great shape". "Because

Author: Irish 64 (2762 Posts - Joined: Nov 2, 2018)

Posted at 10:49 am on Mar 26, 2020
View Single

of all we've done, the risk to the American people is very low."

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NezEbDx4B9A

This message has been edited 3 time(s).

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS