...will this make it more difficult for Democrats to do this again? Or, will they just do it again if they regain power?
matter...here you go...Note the final resolution...
---------------
AI Overview
Yes, the Biden administration's Department of Justice and FBI did open limited investigations and assessments regarding school board interactions, though officials maintained the focus was on criminal threats rather than protected speech.
The Context and Directive
• The NSBA Letter: In September 2021, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to President Joe Biden asking for federal assistance due to rising harassment and threats against school officials, comparing some actions to forms of intimidation or domestic terrorism (an association that the NSBA later apologized for and retracted).
• The Garland Memorandum: Days later, on October 4, 2021, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo directing the FBI and federal prosecutors to coordinate with state and local law enforcement to address a spike in harassment and threats of violence against school personnel.
The Investigations & Findings
• FBI Assessments: Following the directive, the FBI opened a total of 25 preliminary assessments connected to school board threats. Whistleblowers and congressional reports (such as from House Judiciary Republicans) revealed instances where individual parents were looked into—including a mother reported for belonging to a conservative group and owning a firearm, and a father reported for anti-government remarks.
• Outcomes: In these specific instances and across the assessments, the FBI ultimately determined the individuals did not pose credible criminal threats, and no parents faced domestic terrorism charges.
• Controversy and Retraction: The directive drew heavy criticism from Republican lawmakers and parental rights groups who argued it chilled free speech and weaponized federal law enforcement. Later internal DOJ reviews and reports also highlighted that multiple DOJ and FBI officials raised early internal concerns that the directive risked politicizing law enforcement or impinging on constitutionally protected speech. The Garland memorandum was subsequently rescinded.
The original documents and department findings can be reviewed via the Department of Justice Report and the FBI Garland Memo Release.
-----------------
You are a “mark” Ned.
My criticism of Garland is that he lolly gagged in getting Special Counsel appointed to prosecute Trump after January 6th.
It's mind numbingly impossible to comprehend how grown adults turn their heads to facts to continue believing a lie.
