Bengal Bouts and the assumption of risk.
I don’t blame this kid for suing.
I also don’t blame ND for continuing the Bengal Bouts.
Perhaps some modifications are in order.
I don’t blame this kid for suing.
I also don’t blame ND for continuing the Bengal Bouts.
Perhaps some modifications are in order.
But, the lad consented to the gladiator barbarism and cannot now claim to be a victim.
don't know the risks of repeatedly getting punched in the face and head, you probably weren't playing the game with the strongest hand in the first place.
I also recall that they make you sign a waiver to participate, or at least they did 28 years ago.
I won and lost plenty and sparred a ton of rounds, and my only 2 concussions in my life came from flag football.
I hate the idea of canceling Bengal Bouts and what it means to the missions in Bangladesh. And it was one of the most impactful parts of my college years. But I also know that if I were in charge of the University's liability, I'd avoid the fractional risk.
But I absolutely loved it. And despite breaking my nose would do it again. No way I’d encourage my son to do it.
I fought in front of Mohammad Ali. I’ll never forget seeing him or that experience.
1) Did the kid understand the risks?
Of course. He was accepted to Notre Dame which in and of itself demonstrates enough intellect and awareness to make any claim that he didn't understand absurd.
2) Should Notre Dame continue to allow this charitable tradition even among consenting students?
Absolutely not. Especially given the knowledge gained about CTE since the time long ago when the Bengal Bouts began.
I had a healthy fear of him.
Sorta surprising that it still goes on today, with lawyers and all.
still boxing.
But, your Honor, they didn't say anything about "catsup."