Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 8 posts

From the Paper of Record...A local Police Officer's second thoughts on helping ICE ruin lives

TyroneIrish 26316 posts Joined:
Posted

in his town...here's an excerpt...

-------------------
Jaron Alexander is a police officer with a sideline helping ICE. He patrols Ingram, Texas, a town of 1.5 square miles and 1,900 people, where he sees his targets dropping their kids at school and shopping at Walmart. He has helped deport 200 people, and he defends his role: “If you’re taking federal money to do a job,” he said, “I think you should do the job.”

But he also has misgivings.

The Trump administration wants to rid the United States annually of one million (of the 14 million) people who entered the country illegally or overstayed their visas. They hold jobs, raise families, pay taxes, run churches, grill for their block parties. They are enmeshed in American society. They and their communities pay a price when they vanish.

So do some of the people who help deport them.

But his deportation work began to weigh on him last Christmas, he told the reporters Francesca D’Annunzio and McKenzie Funk of ProPublica. Around then, he pulled over two Latino men in a GMC truck for failing to signal a turn — and recognized one of them. It was Ulices Macias, the father of a newborn daughter. He knew the man’s wife.

“I don’t normally do this,” he told her when she showed up to help her husband, “but I’m going to open up the car.” Alexander removed the handcuffs he’d placed on Macias, who hugged his wife, embraced his 4-year-old stepson and held his 2-week-old girl. Then a waiting ICE agent, who appeared on the scene after the traffic stop, cuffed him and took him away.

“I don’t enjoy when families are separated,” Alexander later told one of the family’s cousins. “That kind of fucked me up.”

Later, he made a different choice when Norma Luján, who runs a housecleaning company, confronted him. Alexander was detaining the husband of one of Luján’s employees, who was pregnant.

“I pray for your being, for your soul,” she recalls telling him as she cried. “I want you to think about what you’re doing. Feel it. Feel it, please.” She squeezed his hand. “I need you to look inside your heart,” she continued, “and let him go.”

Alexander didn’t react at first, in Luján’s telling. “God wanted me to meet you,” she said. He met her gaze.

Luján says that Alexander squeezed her hand back and then walked away to make a call. When he returned, he let the worker’s husband go, calling it a matter of “human decency.” He knew, he told the reporters, that a new father “needs to be there helping out.”

Deputized

ICE pays local police officers to help with deportations. A department can get a $100,000 vehicle stipend and, for every officer who pitches in, $7,500 for equipment. Then there is money to cover salaries, overtime and quarterly performance bonuses. Alexander made almost $19,000 in nine months, according to city records — a big boost for someone whose base pay is about $70,000.

The immigration debate is ostensibly about U.S. policy. But immigration enforcement is about people. Their stories are complex, irreducible: Someone comes here and follows all the rules, except the ones about how to enter the country. Another takes money to help deport her but is anguished and haunted by his choices. This story, which you can read for free, captures how lives often resist easy caricature. They can be buffeted by political imperatives, the quest for safety, financial incentives and the most basic human emotions.

That’s interesting. That’s affecting. That’s journalism. It can have the pathos of a novel, but it’s true.
-------------------

Note:...the vast majority of Deportees have no criminal record...how does this make America any Greater?

  • Level 1

    Re: From Officer's second thoughts on helping ICE ruin lives

    (no message)
  • Level 1

    So according to you, we should never deport anyone

    Typical behavior from wrongdoers, trying to play on the emotions of people calling them out.

    • Level 2

      We'll see what happens Nov. 3rd...but it's already clear that Trump has lost whatever ground

      he had gained with Latino and Independent voters...because he Lied about his intentions, and they've seen enough...as this Texas resident explains...

      • Level 3

        To paraphrase Inigo Montoya from the Princess Bride…

        “You keep using those words (due process). I do not think they mean what you think they mean.”

        U.S. immigration courts are administrative courts. They are separate from Article III federal courts in the judicial branch. These courts hear removal (deportation) cases and are staffed by immigration judges appointed by the Attorney General. Because they are administrative rather than constitutional courts, they do not have features like jury trials or Senate‑confirmed judges, but they are still required to follow Fifth Amendment due process protections for all persons in the U.S., including non‑citizens.

        This means that non‑citizens facing deportation are entitled to notice of charges and hearings, a neutral decision‑maker, opportunity to present evidence and cross‑examine witnesses, access to legal representation (though not guaranteed in all cases), and reasoned decisions and the ability to appeal.

        Illegal aliens are given administrative due process by the Trump Administration, but that’s not what leftists want. Democrats want Article III federal courts to take over immigration proceedings. They want to bog the process down and keep their illegal aliens in the country. It’s a continuation of Biden’s open-border policies and part of a cynical strategy to tilt Congressional apportionment to favor blue states and ultimately build another massive dependency class and Democrat voting bloc.

        • Level 4

          Your rendition of Democrats and the Justice System as it applies to Immigrants is notably biased...

          ...here's an AI Summary of this issue...but thanks for attempting to provide some substance...better than most ;-)...

          Note the many examples in our media of Trump denying ANY Due Process for far too many immigrants...documented facts.

          ------------------

          AI Overview

          Democrats are accepting administrative reviews but are actively pushing to reform them by converting the current immigration system into an independent, Article I court system. They do not broadly insist on shifting all primary immigration hearings to standard Article III federal courts, as the sheer volume of cases makes that logistically unfeasible.

          The current positions and legislative efforts within the party break down as follows:

          • Support for Article I, Not Article III, Independent Courts: Rather than demanding that individual cases be heard in traditional Article III federal courts (which have life-tenured judges), Democrats in both the House and Senate have repeatedly introduced legislation to transition the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) out of the Department of Justice. Their goal is to make it an independent Article I court system (similar to the U.S. Tax Court or Bankruptcy Courts). This would shield immigration judges from political pressure and the "at-will" mass firings carried out by executive administrations.

          • Defending the Right to Article III Judicial Review: While Democrats accept that primary evidentiary hearings and asylum applications are processed through administrative reviews, they strongly resist efforts to strip away the secondary layer of review. They insist that noncitizens must retain the right to appeal administrative decisions to Article III federal appellate courts, arguing that completely eliminating federal court oversight violates constitutional due process.

          • Focus on Reforming Administrative Discretion: Within the framework of administrative reviews, Democrats have pushed for the return of "prosecutorial discretion" and "administrative closure"—mechanisms that allow the government to deprioritize and pause deportation cases for long-term residents without criminal records, rather than forcing every individual through an expedited removal process without their day in court.
          ----------------

    • Level 2

      Excellent strawman argument. MAGAgenius at work.

      (no message)
      Jack, he is a banker
      and Jane, she is a clerk
End of conversation