I got 2 things out of the Hearing this morning.
The Dems, especially Nadler were intimidated by Barr and all of them are ok with Fed buildings being under attack, being burned to the ground....wow.
Replies to: I got 2 things out of the Hearing this morning.
One more: Barr is as tough as was Scalia.
It must gall the Dems who stereotype libertarians as neanderthals to see him eviscerate their toady elected representatives as morons. Thank you Congressman Nadler.... too bad Adam
Schiff failed to bring you down before you could humiliate the entire resistance.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g26oYvhnc_w
Dems are spineless and weak. Barr shot back and they cowered like little bitches...
Nadless, Smallwell, and the rest of the Dems suck donkey dick. God help us if the Republicans lose the senate.
I predict the Dems get POTUS and both houses of Congress.
We'll see. Nancy will have a very hard time riding that radical left bull they are chasing towards the election.
I disagree. But if that happens the democrats will the first to object
to the totalitarian regime. This is the last republican president.
I agree, and the bull will need Botox and hair plugs.
Let's hope it's not a white bull or it'll need a spray tan to Orange as well.
Probably. That will be the end of democracy in this country.
(no message)
As Trump employs fed troops into cities inciting violence
dominating Americans and their - our rights to free speech. Funny how R’s scream smaller govt but want to dominate our streets with militia and military, dominate a women’s right to choose, traffic in fear and misinformation, Blanton a broaden the expanse of the DOJ to break down constitution rights. And you all are cheering this on and call the D’s out for it at the same time.
Inciting, that's hilarious.
(no message)
Or to stop Left wingers from burning down federal buildings.
(no message)
Does driving cars into crowds of innocent democratic voters count as "beating"?
How about shooting up a black church?
Or is there a reason your graphic doesn't refer to the murder of innocent democratic voters?
So, you’re saying R’s like big gov’t and D’s don’t.
R’s advocate police killing black men without cause, D’s disagree.
D’s want a fair and equal citizenship, R’s don’t.
Okay.
Who has advocated killing black men for no reason, Jim?
(no message)
Looks like it's you R's, MAS.
(no message)
That is one of your most incorrect posts, which is saying something.
Are you good with Left wingers burning down federal courthouse buildings? Why would the Dems not want to send US marshals to protect those buildings?
No one is good with the burning of buildings, Neddie especially D's.
But it appears you're good with Trumpo siccing the US military on American citizens exercising their rights to free speech.
Of course that isn't true. Can you give an example of something that makes you say that.
Or, are you equating arson with free speech again?
Of course you'd deny it.
(no message)
I know right? Remember 3 to 4 years ago and those out of control tea partiers????
(no message)
This is what they said about Obama and Trump.
Eventually it has to be true I suppose.
I think we are whiplashing back and forth.
With each swing, we go wider.
Eventually, something has to give.
Or, maybe we all get tired and decide to get along again. That would be nice.
But, if people think our institutions are systemically racist, that doesn't bode well for the system. And how can the Left possibly compromise with the mainstream Right which they think is racist?
Or, it will be the beginning of something exciting.
I'm sure a lot of people are taking notes on how the Dems have behaved during the Trump administration.
Don’t most Dems think the incredibly boorish behavior of their House members ....
in today’s Judiciary Committee meeting was totally appropriate? Thus, once they obtain total political control, they will push things even further in the direction of barbarism.
Very nice synopsis, although the board dumb ass will say: Not true and Not true
(no message)
Not true and Not true - Why make up baloney?
What did come across is, Barr, doesn't remember much and he's always willing to interject or interrupt when it pleases him. Jim Jordan hasn't a clue and is always swinging with his fists and missing
and Nadler has lost a few steps.
Outside of that, it was mostly a dog and pony show but it did show off in a bigly way, Barr is Trump's personal fixer though that has always been obvious.
Now why on earth would you respond to something I have to say? Remember??? You said I was full of
shit so stand by what you say.
This morning the Dems were ill prepared and clueless on the matter at hand. (Imagine that) Then, after asking or supposedly asking questions and not letting the guy answer was a lesson in basic, basic, very, very, basic Civil Science.
Done with you.
Peace.