Kamala is an antivaxer. Says she wont take it before the election. Science!
Ignorant hypocrites know nothing of the process. Nothing of the science. They just follow their political interests.
Let's look at the Left's appreciation of science:
What is a male? 23rd chromosome is XY. What is a female? 23rd chromosome is XX. liberals deny this.
Now, liberal Dems now also deny vaccines - for EXACTLY the same reason that the old antivaxers did - they don't trust the government.
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-wont-say-if-she-would-take-a-covid-19-vaccine-approved-before-election/
Replies to: Kamala is an antivaxer. Says she wont take it before the election. Science!
Only 42% of Americans say they would take the Covid Vaccine if approved before the election.
I am surprised it is that large a percentage considering all the lying Donald has done about the virus. 20,000 lies and counting. He has zero credibility.
Link: https://www.rt.com/usa/500401-vaccine-survey-trust-cdc-fail/
Well they are stupid. Wouldn't even you if there was even a small chance it would work?
(no message)
No, based on Donald being a lying POS whose #1 goal is being elected
I would let others try it first. If it is proven to work for them with NO SIDE EFFECTS I might try it.
So science isn't really your concern, it's politics.
(no message)
No, that's not it at all. The concern is Donald will push CDC to put out a vaccine before it has
been proven effective and safe. A reasonable concern in that Donald's number one priority is getting reelected. He cares little about the welfare of the American people.
Not only wouldn't he do that, he CAN'T do that. And in meantime, D leaders undermine public trust in
the vaccine, creating a whole new group of antivaxers.
Of course he would he is a totally unscrupulous POS. The only thing that matters to him
is getting reelected. The only thing Donald cares about is what is good for Donald. Hydroxychloroquin received approval because Donald pushed it. It was worthless. Why do you think Caputo was the spokes person for HHS? Maybe because Donald could depend on him to lie for Donald?
Wrong! Wrong as usual.
(no message)
20,000 lies and counting, only the stupidest of the stupid believe anything he says.
(no message)
20000? Do you have one of those balls/strikes count devices umps use?
(no message)
She is not an anti-vaxxer. You are not being honest.
(no message)
He never has been, why would he start now?
(no message)
Yes she is. She makes the EXACT argument that other antivaxers make - she doesn't trust the govt
(no message)
Skepticism about Trump's influence on the vaccine process does not make her an anti-vaxxer
(no message)
Oh give me a break. His progress on any vaccine has exceeded anybody else's at a similar point in
time of development.
So why do old antivaxers skepticism about Obama's influence on vaccine process make them antivaxers?
(no message)
Rolleyes
(no message)
I honestly cannot believe Chris has been defending these indefensible positions lately. He is
utterly blind to the hypocrisy.
Its almost like he is in a cult.....
(no message)
Indeed. Accuse others of that which you yourself are/do. Liberalism Rule #1.
(no message)
So Trump is telling all the drug companies to fudge results? Do you have proof?
(no message)
Will you take it? Yes or No?
(no message)
D’s will not allow any cure prior to the election.
(no message)
I completed the initial application for the Phase III Moderna vivid-19 trial
After making it past the initial screen, I learned more about the requirements. I would have participated, but it is a 2 year commitment, and follow up appointments were going to be too inconvenient with work.
Absolutely.
(no message)
Not me.
(no message)
Don't be like Harris.
(no message)
A lying pot smoker? Correct I won't. As far as vaccine I'll wait and see
(no message)
Shocker.
(no message)
Why do you say that?
(no message)
Indeed. Chris defends Harris, but not you cuz he isn't really concerned about COVID, just politics.
and apparently his claim about wanting to follow science is a farce also.
Because the companies working on the vaccine won't produce a "real" vaccine until it's clear that...
...The Harris Administration is about to assume control?
No, that's not it at all. The concern is Donald will push CDC to put out a vaccine before it has
been proven effective and safe. You have to realize Donald's first priority is getting reelected. Safety of those who might take the vaccine is of little importance.
Can you prove this or is it your opinion? Did Vindman hear something?
(no message)