Does not compute. Does not compute.
Meanwhile the GOP SecState from Georgia refused to take Trump’s call during the recount.
Trump’s clumsy effort to use the power of the presidency to deliver election results looks to be in trouble.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/20/tucker-carlson-sidney-powell-fraud/
Senate investigation is nearly inevitable. You'll have to move to Georgia to stop it.
Biden has signaled he doesn’t intend to resurrect the Orange investigations. If the Senate decides to do the Bobulinski, the HR is gonna do the IRS and the McGahn on Orange and the R’s.
and taking foreign money for access to his father.
At this point, only Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney and Susan Collins have decided they don't need Trump to keep their seats. Everyone else is too afraid to move on from him.
If Trump stays in the spotlight, I don't see that changing.
It's not hard. I have a TV remote. I stopped watching Fox and Tucker / Hannity are both collateral damage. There is plenty of talk radio that I can get a fair shake on things. Don't need Fox but they need me. OAN is a nice alternative and so is Newsmax. Fox will learn through tough love but it may be too late.
Here is Sidney Powell’s response to the Tucker piece.
If you have a case bring it on and if you don't stop with the nonsensical press conferences led by another old boomer who seems to have lost his mind.
Narcissus ultimately killed himself. Trump was always doomed to self-destruct. But now his devotees want to take down the whole Republican party and the country with him by turning everything to the squad out of spite.
This is exactly why I like Tucker. He is fair IMO. He isn't afraid to call out Trump or the Republicans. I find that to be the case for a lot of coverage on Fox.
I am fully aware that shows like Hannity are biased and 100% on the Trump train. Unlike most people who watch CNN, MSNBC, etc. I don't delude myself into believing that my information sources are unbiased when they clearly aren't.
Gave it up like I gave up the NBA.
It's not very often though. I basically quit the NBA and NFL years ago.
I still enjoy some MLB, but invest most of my time in college football, soccer and golf.
I'm getting ready to go dark on cable news again soon. I got dragged in during the election.
I try to get all views. I listen a lot to Rush and Hannity, and watch Fox too. I even turned on Newsmax yesterday at lunch - they had on Alan Dershowitz and Mark Halperin to analyze the Rudy presser. Too bad Bill Cosby is still in jail, or they could have gone all-pervert.
He asked Sidney Powell for her evidence, she didn’t give it to him. You have a CNN Law Degree, if you had evidence would you share it with the media? I’ll still tune in and watch him because he isn’t afraid to call out Republicans as well as Dems. Let me know the first time the BS you call news has anything bad to say about Biden.
Attorney Sidney Powell had a bombshell: election machines used algorithms to flip votes from Trump to Biden.
Tucker wanted proof and invited her on his show. She said no, but he kept trying until she told him to bug off.
Tucker wanted evidence before he would run with such a story. He cares about truth and getting it right.
That's how a journalist is supposed to be.
Tucker deserves nothing. He is making big big bucks from Fox. He has to keep up the façade of fair and balanced warrior while still making his Fox masters happy. Hannity has the same problem. Problem is, viewers notice and they will react accordingly. Tucker, Hannity, Gutfield, and Watters will all be victims of this Fox ratings downslide. Guilt by association. You can't have it both ways. It was Tucker who used the made up media tern "President elect" when referring to Harris/Biden and viewers noticed. You cannot be fair and balanced all the while bending a knee to your Fox masters.
The people fighting for Trump being doxxed and threatened is disgusting. Their role models at the Lincoln Project are some of the main offenders. But then again, I shouldn’t be shocked. They watched all summer as cities were burned and looted without a word being said against the idiots doing it. They cheered that on as “peaceful protests”.
Unlike you who accepted Russia, Russia,Russia without good evidence, we expect good evidence.
Unlike you, we will not back the candidate “no matter what”.
It is a difference that you cannot see. You are a zealot so entrenched in your mindset that others who do not agree appear as zealots to you. Every piece of information, every spin of the story, every issue is always seen through your hyperbolic political lens. We are not like you in that regard.
But that does not mean that we will not listen. It’s time for Trump’s team to spill their evidence so that we can see for ourselves. That the Dems cheated seems pretty obvious, but that Trump can prove it does not.
Link: https://mobile.twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1329629701447573504/photo/1
You have blindly alleged “cheating” in urban precincts because you assume that only predominantly white voter precincts conduct fair elections.
Voting fraud surfaces very quickly. It reveals itself on GameDay. There is none notwithstanding unprecedented scrutiny.
The United States ran a clean election, thanks to decent and honorable state and local election officials who defended the franchise.
Follow your own pre-election edicts and respect the verdict.
Yield like a man.
At one point, I remember when tort reform (laws against bringing frivolous lawsuits) was a conservative value. Not anymore apparently
.... to invalidate the vote counts.
In other words, Trump's legal team was unable to bring a meritorious legal action in a court of law, striking out on numerous at bats.
So, the play is to now simply have Republicans who serve on election certification boards or legislatures to pay homage to Trump, as opposed to honor their oaths of office.
That is where we are. Your tribe.
because if you weren't, you have zero clue what was said or done. that's not even circumstantial - that's pure inadmissible.
try again.
better yet. don't try again. you're embarrassing your little self.
Hypocrite.
as a lawyer, you should be demanding that all and every allegation be brought to trial - the only place evidence can be presented with consequence. the court of public opinion (which is so far the only place anything has really happened) cannot be used for adjudication. apparently, though, you've already reached your personal verdict - without the benefit of hard evidence of any sort. how can you do that as a lawyer in good conscience? once the court decisions are handed down, everyone should be satisfied that the outcome, whatever it might be, is truly based on the best legal system this country has to offer. before that, nothing is settled.
Keep fishing 67.
why don't we wait until someone who's really qualified and unbiased to decide if it's frivolous or not? someone whose judgement isn't obscured by hatred for the country, its values, and its principles. if it's then judged to be frivolous by competent authority, then so be it. until then, it's a legal challenge.
seeking out truth and justice is not "fishing". it's my constitutional right and you're obviously opposed to that.
... establishing a pattern of voter fraud.
I suppose in your world, a losing candidate can just keep filing lawsuit after lawsuit until perpetuity, ... so that no election result can ever be final.
Trump told everyone in SEPT that he would do this, in an effort to delay certification so that the legislatures (not the voters) would choose the President.
Pull your head out of your ass.
no one in their right mind (notice the use of the word "right" here) would bring any case to court prematurely. once the data and evidence are sufficient and substantiated, things will move in that direction. additionally, the demlib al gore challenges raged for much longer than this and you didn't think a thing about that. why didn't you moan then? and how about your idiot idol, hillary, telling joe to "never concede"? you didn't come here and denounce that little gem, did you? so, it appears you're just fine with challenges and denials as long as they fit your personal agenda, but otherwise they're "frivolous". what if the allegations are proven true? how are you going to justify your opposition to that outcome? are you going to yield?
people on this board with that one line. Well done!!!
