Can’t be easy for you Tucker fans to watch him bash Team Trump
Does not compute. Does not compute.
Meanwhile the GOP SecState from Georgia refused to take Trump’s call during the recount.
Trump’s clumsy effort to use the power of the presidency to deliver election results looks to be in trouble.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/20/tucker-carlson-sidney-powell-fraud/
Replies to: Can’t be easy for you Tucker fans to watch him bash Team Trump
We’ll always have the Big Bobulinski with him, yes we will.
(no message)
Prediction: Bobulinski is going to make some headlines in 2021.
Senate investigation is nearly inevitable. You'll have to move to Georgia to stop it.
Maybe, maybe not.
Biden has signaled he doesn’t intend to resurrect the Orange investigations. If the Senate decides to do the Bobulinski, the HR is gonna do the IRS and the McGahn on Orange and the R’s.
I cant believe Moderate Joe is going to drop the investigation into his crack head son
and taking foreign money for access to his father.
Republican Senators are not going to care what happens to Trump after Jan 2021
(no message)
If they don't stick with Trump they would have to worry about a primary challenge
At this point, only Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney and Susan Collins have decided they don't need Trump to keep their seats. Everyone else is too afraid to move on from him.
If Trump stays in the spotlight, I don't see that changing.
Meh. We’ll see, but I doubt it.
(no message)
Prediction: no one outside the OANN/Newsmax insanity bubble will see those headlines
(no message)
I predict my prediction is more predictive than yours.
(no message)
Re: Can’t be easy for you Tucker fans to watch him bash Team Trump
It's not hard. I have a TV remote. I stopped watching Fox and Tucker / Hannity are both collateral damage. There is plenty of talk radio that I can get a fair shake on things. Don't need Fox but they need me. OAN is a nice alternative and so is Newsmax. Fox will learn through tough love but it may be too late.
I know you like to be fair and balanced with your views. Yeah right.
Here is Sidney Powell’s response to the Tucker piece.
Link: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sidney-powell-fires-back-tucker-carlson-was-insulting-demanding-and-rude
I've never been on team Trump and Tucker is making exactly the right argument.
If you have a case bring it on and if you don't stop with the nonsensical press conferences led by another old boomer who seems to have lost his mind.
Unleash the Kracken!
(no message)
And that would be a Democratically controlled Senate.
Narcissus ultimately killed himself. Trump was always doomed to self-destruct. But now his devotees want to take down the whole Republican party and the country with him by turning everything to the squad out of spite.
You mean the Elite Strike Force with the Kracken? They can only do this because our party lets them
(no message)
Can't argue with that. Spinelessness is sine qua non for the establishment pols on both sides.
(no message)
I don't think you understand most conservatives or the Fox audience.
This is exactly why I like Tucker. He is fair IMO. He isn't afraid to call out Trump or the Republicans. I find that to be the case for a lot of coverage on Fox.
I am fully aware that shows like Hannity are biased and 100% on the Trump train. Unlike most people who watch CNN, MSNBC, etc. I don't delude myself into believing that my information sources are unbiased when they clearly aren't.
Solution: Just don’t watch any of it. All cable “news” is drivel and bloviation.
Gave it up like I gave up the NBA.
👍👍on the NBA
(no message)
NFL is also getting there. It’s a sports league not a social justice society.
(no message)
The only reason I OCCASIONALLY tune into the NFL is to check out some Domers.
It's not very often though. I basically quit the NBA and NFL years ago.
I still enjoy some MLB, but invest most of my time in college football, soccer and golf.
I still watch it, especially playoffs, but I’m fast turning away from it
(no message)
Good on you. I give it up, but eventually wander back in.
I'm getting ready to go dark on cable news again soon. I got dragged in during the election.
I'll bet I watch/listen to more news sources from the other side than anyone here
I try to get all views. I listen a lot to Rush and Hannity, and watch Fox too. I even turned on Newsmax yesterday at lunch - they had on Alan Dershowitz and Mark Halperin to analyze the Rudy presser. Too bad Bill Cosby is still in jail, or they could have gone all-pervert.
I could give you a run for your money!
(no message)
That's good to hear. We all need to stay out of the echo chambers.
(no message)
Since when is it required to show evidence on Tucker' show? Media deserve nothing.
(no message)
Tucker has his opinion on what is going on. As an American, it’s his right.
He asked Sidney Powell for her evidence, she didn’t give it to him. You have a CNN Law Degree, if you had evidence would you share it with the media? I’ll still tune in and watch him because he isn’t afraid to call out Republicans as well as Dems. Let me know the first time the BS you call news has anything bad to say about Biden.
Tucker Carlson is a lonely voice against the monolithic, totalitarian MSM.
Attorney Sidney Powell had a bombshell: election machines used algorithms to flip votes from Trump to Biden.
Tucker wanted proof and invited her on his show. She said no, but he kept trying until she told him to bug off.
Tucker wanted evidence before he would run with such a story. He cares about truth and getting it right.
That's how a journalist is supposed to be.
Re: Tucker Carlson is a lonely voice against the monolithic, totalitarian MSM.
Tucker deserves nothing. He is making big big bucks from Fox. He has to keep up the façade of fair and balanced warrior while still making his Fox masters happy. Hannity has the same problem. Problem is, viewers notice and they will react accordingly. Tucker, Hannity, Gutfield, and Watters will all be victims of this Fox ratings downslide. Guilt by association. You can't have it both ways. It was Tucker who used the made up media tern "President elect" when referring to Harris/Biden and viewers noticed. You cannot be fair and balanced all the while bending a knee to your Fox masters.
Oh please. He’s zero different from MadCow in his bloviating.
(no message)
hear here! this is excellent reason.
(no message)
No place for reason with theses Liberals. We need to do what they say or else.
The people fighting for Trump being doxxed and threatened is disgusting. Their role models at the Lincoln Project are some of the main offenders. But then again, I shouldn’t be shocked. They watched all summer as cities were burned and looted without a word being said against the idiots doing it. They cheered that on as “peaceful protests”.
Without evidence, the claims mean nothing, but very unlike you, we are listening.
Unlike you who accepted Russia, Russia,Russia without good evidence, we expect good evidence.
Unlike you, we will not back the candidate “no matter what”.
It is a difference that you cannot see. You are a zealot so entrenched in your mindset that others who do not agree appear as zealots to you. Every piece of information, every spin of the story, every issue is always seen through your hyperbolic political lens. We are not like you in that regard.
But that does not mean that we will not listen. It’s time for Trump’s team to spill their evidence so that we can see for ourselves. That the Dems cheated seems pretty obvious, but that Trump can prove it does not.
Listen to Mitt.
(no message)
Link: https://mobile.twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1329629701447573504/photo/1
The criminal defense counsellor doesn’t want to hear the evidence which he has prejudged.
(no message)
This lawyer understands what constitutes evidence.
You have blindly alleged “cheating” in urban precincts because you assume that only predominantly white voter precincts conduct fair elections.
Voting fraud surfaces very quickly. It reveals itself on GameDay. There is none notwithstanding unprecedented scrutiny.
The United States ran a clean election, thanks to decent and honorable state and local election officials who defended the franchise.
Follow your own pre-election edicts and respect the verdict.
Yield like a man.
And you haven’t seen it yet, but your mind is decided. I rest my case, hypocrite.
(no message)
Bring it to a courtroom. That is the way it works in real America.
(no message)
Which is what he is doing, isn't it? Don't hurt yourself with that pivot.
(no message)
He's brought 30 legal challenges and won only once in a case that won't affect any counted ballot
At one point, I remember when tort reform (laws against bringing frivolous lawsuits) was a conservative value. Not anymore apparently
No, Trump has abandoned that path. He is now pressuring election officials and legislators ....
.... to invalidate the vote counts.
In other words, Trump's legal team was unable to bring a meritorious legal action in a court of law, striking out on numerous at bats.
So, the play is to now simply have Republicans who serve on election certification boards or legislatures to pay homage to Trump, as opposed to honor their oaths of office.
That is where we are. Your tribe.
didn't know you were at those meetings.
because if you weren't, you have zero clue what was said or done. that's not even circumstantial - that's pure inadmissible.
try again.
better yet. don't try again. you're embarrassing your little self.
You haven't seen any either and your mind is decided. "That the Dems cheated seems pretty obvious"
Hypocrite.
you, of all people, should be strongly supporting the legal process.
as a lawyer, you should be demanding that all and every allegation be brought to trial - the only place evidence can be presented with consequence. the court of public opinion (which is so far the only place anything has really happened) cannot be used for adjudication. apparently, though, you've already reached your personal verdict - without the benefit of hard evidence of any sort. how can you do that as a lawyer in good conscience? once the court decisions are handed down, everyone should be satisfied that the outcome, whatever it might be, is truly based on the best legal system this country has to offer. before that, nothing is settled.
Lawyers are ethically prohibited from bringing frivolous lawsuits. That is what I know.
Keep fishing 67.
well, that's your single, prejudiced opinion about the allegations, isn't it?
why don't we wait until someone who's really qualified and unbiased to decide if it's frivolous or not? someone whose judgement isn't obscured by hatred for the country, its values, and its principles. if it's then judged to be frivolous by competent authority, then so be it. until then, it's a legal challenge.
seeking out truth and justice is not "fishing". it's my constitutional right and you're obviously opposed to that.
We are 17 days beyond Election Day. You still cannot cite a court case ....
... establishing a pattern of voter fraud.
I suppose in your world, a losing candidate can just keep filing lawsuit after lawsuit until perpetuity, ... so that no election result can ever be final.
Trump told everyone in SEPT that he would do this, in an effort to delay certification so that the legislatures (not the voters) would choose the President.
Pull your head out of your ass.
you are correct there is not a court case. yet.
no one in their right mind (notice the use of the word "right" here) would bring any case to court prematurely. once the data and evidence are sufficient and substantiated, things will move in that direction. additionally, the demlib al gore challenges raged for much longer than this and you didn't think a thing about that. why didn't you moan then? and how about your idiot idol, hillary, telling joe to "never concede"? you didn't come here and denounce that little gem, did you? so, it appears you're just fine with challenges and denials as long as they fit your personal agenda, but otherwise they're "frivolous". what if the allegations are proven true? how are you going to justify your opposition to that outcome? are you going to yield?
"it's my constitutional right and you're obviously opposed to that" - you summed up multiple
people on this board with that one line. Well done!!!