will let these stats marinate for awhile
(no message)
Link: https://x.com/dianekaylacy/status/2091649170616537474?s=46
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 25 posts
-
Level 1
Open your eyes and note the stats for mass killings in the U.S….we need to get together and put
Effective Gun Control Laws in place…and diligently enforce them.
-
Level 2
You're trying to switch the topic. It doesn't work.
You're pretending this topic is "mass shootings," which still show that a small portion of our population is dramatically over-represented.
The violent crime per capita is wildly out of proportion for one community in this country. People have their own reasoning for the "why," but gun control laws are not the panacea you want to pretend they are as a solution
-
Level 3
Do you dispute the Statista data on Mass Killings?...if not, then how do you explain the large
volume of White Mass Killers...i.e. no one race is better than any other when it comes to extreme violence, especially with guns.
Go investigate the murder rate (esp. w/guns) for all developed countries on the planet...and then compare/contrast the gun control measures in the countries with the lowest rates vs. ours...wake up, Jake.
The ISSUE is Senseless Murders with Guns...solve that and we don't have to have these discussions.
-
Level 4
You're trying to pretend the topic is "mass shootings."
The topic is violent crime. And one community is exponentially worse than all others per capita.
Gun Control laws aren't going to solve that. If it were, Chicago would be far safer than it is.
-
Level 5
I already pointed out to him whites are underrepresented and blacks are overrepresented
on mass shootings but he keeps going with, "how do you explain the large number of white mass shooters? From his own data:
Whites as % of population: 62
Whites as % of mass shooters: 55Blacks as % of population: 13
Blacks as % of mass shooters: 16 -
Level 5
How do you manage to leave out “Mass Shootings” from the Topic of “Violent Crime”?…
It is you…and WesrCoast… who are skewing the subject matter…toward an obviously Racist Agenda.
-
-
Level 7
Are you blaming Violent Crime on Black Americans with no concern for Mass Killings by Whites?
(no message)-
Level 8
Just admit you tried and failed to redirect the topic.
No one's falling for this shtick. Even your handlers would call this weak sauce.
-
Level 9
WestCoast...and apparently you as well...failed to drive a racist wedge into the issue of Violent
Crime in America...thanks to the evidence shown in the Statista data on Mass Killings since 1982...not something that can, or should, be ignored when discussing VC...but you sure did.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 3
Juvies don’t care about gun laws.
You could take every legal gun out of circulation and juvies are still going to get them.
-
-
-
Level 3
I sincerely hope that you don’t think there is no need for gun control…just look at the global stats
For gun violence…”people are people” all over the world…with parental issues too.
-
-
Level 2
Too funny. You just burned yourself with these stats
Percent of white population: 62%
Percent of white mass shooters: 55%Percent of black population: 13%
Percent of black mass shooters: 16%One is underrepresented and one is overrepresented...
-
Level 3
I read the article’s commentary re: “Racial Balance”…no race get’s a thumbs up pass when it comes to
Gun Violence…you can’t possibly pin this problem on minorities like WestCoast tried to do…can you?
There’s Nothing Funny about these Tragedies, Mark.
Btw, any reply to my Sat. post on Drs Fareed and Tyson's study?...especially wrt the logic of getting 100% effectiveness...when no other medical science organization on earth was able to prove that claim...for ANY treatment or vaccine.
-
Level 4
As for your post, you clearly implied white people are the main perpetrators of mass shootings
Which, by raw numbers is correct, obviously, but by ratio they're not.n
-
Level 5
That's what the data from Statista says...it sure isn't ZERO...
Let's face reality...the USA leads the world in Gun Homicides by an enormous margin...this is shameful...let's all get together and work on a solution aimed at dramatically reducing those numbers. Other countries have done it...we can too.
-
-
Level 4
Dr. Fareed said zero deaths. Dr. Risch's paper says 84% effective..."coincidentally," the same % as
Paxlovid, a drug designed to perfectly mimic HCQ+.
I don't have an explanation for Dr. Fareed saying zero deaths, so thanks to you I'll probably buy his book to find out what really happened.
-
Level 5
Do some critical thinking before posting...i.e. research the 'alternative' approach...it's not hard,
all you have to do is ask the right questions. Here's what actually happened with PAXLOVID...Note that HCQ+ only changed the pH of a cell to slow down its processing of the virus...it did nothing at all about the critical element, which I've highlighted for you more than once over the last few years (hard to believe, but true).
----------------
AI OverviewPfizer first began investigating its oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 on Friday, March 13, 2020. On this date, the company officially tasked a medicinal chemistry team to explore resources needed to develop an oral drug to combat the emerging pandemic.
Key Milestones in Development
March 13, 2020: Drug discovery program initiated internally.
March 17, 2020: Pfizer partnered with BioNTech to develop a preventative vaccine.
March 23, 2021: Phase 1 clinical trials began for the oral antiviral drug.
November 2021: Clinical trial results showed the treatment cut hospitalization and death risks by 89%.
December 2021: The FDA authorized the drug under the brand name Paxlovid.Scientific Background
Pfizer did not start completely from scratch. Scientists utilized previous research from the 2003 SARS outbreak. They modified an older chemical lead designed to block a critical protease enzyme [3CL] that coronaviruses need to replicate. This historical data allowed Pfizer to accelerate development and bring the pill to clinical trials within a year. More details about the chemical development process are available via the American Chemical Society....
----------------------
i.e. Pfizer was WAY ahead of Drs Fareed and Tyson with their PAXLOVID oral anti-viral product.Since Dr. Fareed wouldn't take the time and effort to get his study peer-reviewed, don't reward him by spending your money on his book...your choice, though.
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1
Subhuman. Speaking of, Karmelo Anthony was denied a retrial.
Apparently his defense attorneys -- funded by psychotic leftists - plan to go for an appellate court next.
End of conversation