Good or bad idea?
(no message)
(no message)
recent case in San Jose, CA...(see link)
I'm sure the intentions of the ND Administration are good...but its use carries responsibility.
Perhaps any university could be targeted by terrorists or a nut looking to make a statement via a mass shooting. Notre Dame has a heightened profile as both a prominent catholic university and being center stage for college football.
As in any privacy intrusion question, it comes down to reasonableness in striking a balance between protecting public/student safety vs protecting the privacy of the comings and goings of thousands of citizens.
I frankly know very little about the technology, and more importantly, the effectiveness and reliability of disseminated information captured by the cameras. [Are these cameras simply the suggestion of general counsel to provide cover???]
Not taking a side. But, it is worthy of a conversation.
Link: https://www.aclu.org/campaigns-initiatives/get-the-flock-out
I don't see security cameras on private property with thousands of young adults in their charge as being Big Brother.
It is their property...so I don't have the same objection I do to governments doing it.
Still, they should have posted and notified...
Those cameras can also be used to
identify defiant trespassers such as
unauthorized protesters with bad intentions.
People used to understand and pay at least some attention to George Orwell's messages...back when we had a halfway decent education system...